User:Juliancolton/Review

– Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 04:14, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Thought you handled yourself with aplomb when I was moaning at you. Hiding T 12:22, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
 * keep in mind, this is IMHO. You do damn fine work Julian, and we're a much better website with you being an admin here.  You come across (to me anyway) as very reserved, quiet, and at times almost timid.  Speak up son, tell us when we're wrong, state loudly and boldly why you believe in a certain point of view.  You have a great head on your shoulders, don't be afraid to say what you're thinking at times.  I'm not suggesting that you go against your natural calm demeanor, but I'd like to see more of what's going through that pensive mind of yours sometimes. ;) — Ched :  ?  15:16, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Excellent point; I'll keep that in mind. Thanks! – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 16:26, 17 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Personally (and this is solely my opinion), I find you one of the more level-headed admins around. When you have something intelligent to say, you say it, and I cannot recall anything unintelligent coming from you. Your comments at both WT:RFA and WP:CHU are always clear and helpful. Keep up the good work! -- Avi (talk) 14:28, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
 * All good to me. Stifle (talk) 13:36, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks both, good to hear. :) – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 15:25, 19 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Haven't had that much interaction with you, but everything that I've seen shows an enormous dedication to the project. One of the most versatile and prolific administrators around. Does good work in AFD, RFP/R, CHU to name a few. Of course, this review isn't very helpful. I'll let you know if anything negative turns up :) decltype (talk) 06:27, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
 * I'll add my praise here as well, Julian is one of the most dedicated and helpful admins I know and there really is nothing alarmingly negative to mention. Admin review was originally also supposed to help admins who considered cratship to evaluate their chances. If I were to use it for that, I'd say you'd make a great crat. Unfortunate for us that you do not plan on running anytime soon. Regards  So Why  10:57, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
 * I can't say I agree 100 % with Juliancolton, but the results speak for themselves. Keep on mopping. Bearian (talk) 18:33, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
 * A++ admin. Your admin work is prasieworthy; I've only seen good things from you. AdjustShift (talk) 19:00, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
 * doubleplusgood. AGK 23:12, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Well that's a new one! – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 21:26, 26 May 2009 (UTC)


 * JC, even with all the nice things people are saying above, I think you're still underrated. I'm reminded of the Twain quote, "Really great people make you feel that you, too, can become great."  People tend to feel good about themselves when JC is around, because he encourages and leads by example, without being self-promotional, at RFA, FAC, UAA, and many chat channels and wikiprojects. - Dank (push to talk) 13:56, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I noticed you only have 59 edits to the file namespace. If you were interested in expanding your admin work to other areas you might consider working on this.--Rockfang (talk) 03:58, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the tip. I do quite a bit of work at Commons, so I am familiar with files, but I'll look into that. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 04:07, 13 June 2009 (UTC)


 * I have never seen any problems which have been created or made worse by Juliancolton. Far too many edits recently for my liking though but I'll pass/support/whatever it is you do here. ;) Ever considered or been involved at WP:ITN/C? -- can  dle &bull; wicke  18:25, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Approve —Animum (talk) 00:15, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Great deletion and clerking work. I would suggest waiting the full 10080 minutes before closing AfDs, though. -- King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 22:50, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
 * I noticed during your recent RfB that there was feedback that you should do less "me too" commenting, and I want to observe here that I believe that you are doing a good job of taking that advice to heart. I've been seeing you make substantive, thoughtful comments on various matters where you clearly take a side, and even in some cases where I happen to disagree with you, you always appear to have good reasons for your position. Obviously, you continue to be one of the most active and visible editors here, all good. --Tryptofish (talk) 14:14, 23 August 2009 (UTC)