User:Juliannar9887/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.


 * Name of article: Category:Academic disciplines
 * Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate. I have chosen this article to evaluate because it has to do with academic discipline which is a very important topic that people should be educated on.

Lead

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? No, there is not an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic.
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? No.
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? No.
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? No, not much information.

Content

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic? Yes.
 * Is the content up-to-date? Yes.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? In the beginning of the article there is the word "uhhh" and I believe this does not belong here.

Tone and Balance

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article neutral? Yes.
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? No.
 * Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No.

Sources and References

 * Guiding questions


 * Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?No.
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? No, they do not represent the subject.
 * Are the sources current? No.
 * Check a few links. Do they work? No.

Organization

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Yes.
 * Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors? Yes.
 * Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Yes.

Images and Media

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? No.
 * Are images well-captioned? No.
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? No.
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? No.

Checking the talk page

 * Guiding questions


 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic? Someone says that It could be improved if there were outlines or brief introductions of the topic before introducing the links
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects? Yes, to improve the coverage of education and. education-related topics.
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class? Not very broad. or the. way. it is discussed from class.

Overall impressions

 * Guiding questions


 * What is the article's overall status? Needs improvement.
 * What are the article's strengths? Wide range of categories.
 * How can the article be improved? More information with each category and useful sources that work.
 * How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed? Poorly developed.

Optional activity

 * Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~


 * Link to feedback: