User:Julie Foss/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Talk:Phum Snay

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article because although it had good basic information, it was lacking overall.

Evaluate the article
The lead section includes relevant, basic information to set up the rest of the page. It is not very detailed however, and there is not much information. The content is straightforward, but not comprehensive. The dates are vague, and not specific. The tone is neutral, but not sophisticated. There is not information on altered viewpoints. The sources are relevant, and overall reliable. The organization is not impressive, but there are not any glaring issues. Overall, there is much to be desired from this page, but nothing is explicitly wrong. Julie Foss (talk) 05:02, 27 January 2022 (UTC)