User:Jumanaabdelgadir/Energy democracy/Jigmelamo Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Jumana Abdelgadir


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jumanaabdelgadir/Energy_democracy?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Energy democracy

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead

The lead is concise and convenient to read. The sentence added by the peer is a smooth transition from the previous sentence which makes the lead stronger and augments the argument of the article.

Content

The content added are relevant and updated. Need to add more contents on top of the two sentences.

Tone and balance

The contents added are neutral and factual. The claims made are not biased and the view points are adequately represented.

Sources and references

There is only one source and the article is current published in 2020. Need to cite more source. The article is scholarly which is peer reviewed and extensive.

Organization

The content added is organized, no grammar error or spelling error. It is easy to read.