User:JuniorSanchez23/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluate
Herpetology

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this specific category because it fell under the broader zoology category. Similar to invertebrate zoology herpetology is a discipline of biology that focuses on particular phylums. My preliminary impression is that the article is well-organized and many words have definitions linked to them.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

Lead section: The lead section of the article includes a summary of what the rest of the article is about. Detailed and concise summary with plenty of links to definitions of any keywords.

Content: The content is up-to-date and relevant to the subject, except for the "study" portion which includes the lack of herpetology majors in universities.

Sources: All references seem to be reliable websites and some peer-reviewed articles.

Tone and Balance: The article overall has a neutral tone. There seems to be no bias toward any position.

Writing quality: So far there are no grammar mistakes that I've seen in the article. Broken down into concise sections. Very easy to follow, transition from topics is fluid.

Images: Plenty of images and captions spaced out to help illustrate the main topic.

Talk page: On the talk page there was an edit on the definition of words and one deletion.

Overall: The level 5 article was rated a class C on Wikipedia. I believe that the article was well written and focused on the main idea of the article. The only issue that I believe the article has is the lack of relevance the "study" section has. The "study" section includes the opportunities for herpetology as a major in universities.