User:Junwei Sheng/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.


 * Name of article: Artificial intelligence in video games
 * For my perspective, game is an indispensable part of modern life. I think that games and intelligence are inseparable, because people need to observe, think, learn, practice, and use the knowledge accumulated in the past to win rewards. The emergence of AI games means that players need to further develop their brains, have more knowledge and creative ideas.

Lead

 * Guiding questions

Yes. No. This article's lead section does not adequately summarize key   points of its contents. No. It is concise, but can be improved.
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?

Content

 * Guiding questions

Yes. No. No. But it has more areas, which has not mentioned in the lead section.
 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
 * Is the content up-to-date?
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?

Tone and Balance

 * Guiding questions

Yes. No. No. No.
 * Is the article neutral?
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?

Sources and References

 * Guiding questions

Not all the facts has backed up by a reliable secondary source. Yes. No. Some are outdated. Yes.
 * Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Are the sources current?
 * Check a few links. Do they work?

Organization

 * Guiding questions

Yes, but some sections have no reason to appear. Yes, a few. No.
 * Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?

Images and Media

 * Guiding questions

Just one image. Yes. Yes. Yes.
 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

Checking the talk page

 * Guiding questions

Ask questions about different kinds of AI. AI in video games has been listed as a level-5 vital articale. It is a part of WikiProject Video Games. The way that Wikipedia discusses this topic has more external link to study by people, not only the content for this article.
 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?

Overall impressions

 * Guiding questions

It needs more content and references. It talks basic AI program and history for video games with concise examples. It needs more images. Some sections need more detailed information and resources. It is underdeveloped.
 * What is the article's overall status?
 * What are the article's strengths?
 * How can the article be improved?
 * How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed?

Optional activity

 * Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~


 * Link to feedback: Talk:Artificial intelligence in video games