User:Jurta/XfD log

This is a log of all deletion discussion nominations made by this user using Twinkle's XfD module.

If you no longer wish to keep this log, you can turn it off using the preferences panel, and nominate this page for speedy deletion under CSD U1.

September 2023

 * Ohio (Internet humour): nominated at AfD; notified 11:26, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Appears to fail WP:N. Couldn't find much secondary sources online and the article only cites 6 sources, two of which have been deemed as unreliable per WP:VG/RS. It also cited We Got This Covered which I've removed in accordance with WP:WEGOTTHISCOVERED.indy100 could be reliable due to being owned by The Independent, but I'm not so sure about Distractify.

October 2023

 * Englandia: nominated at AfD; notified 18:43, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Fails WP:NF, but can't tell because of how the article is formatted. Most external links in this article (which I believe acts as references) point to Google searches, and the rest point to topics, not articles, on The Times of India, which has no bearing on notability per WP:TOI.
 * Kirdar-E-Sardar: nominated at AfD; notified 20:11, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Fails WP:NF. Only includes a single reference and I'm not aware of any other reliable sources that've covered this in great detail.

November 2023

 * Odie: nominated at AfD; notified 14:53, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Fails WP:GNG. Article only contains 3 sources, two of which are primary, and any reliable sources that I found online appear to be WP:TRIVIAL mentions.

January 2024

 * Verbal ASE: nominated at AfD; notified 14:02, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Fails WP:GNG and WP:NBIO. Most of the articles sources are not reliable (see Genius and Sportskeeda) and/or closely connected to the subject. Also seems to fall under WP:BLP1E, with the sole event potentially violating the WP:BLP guidelines.

February 2024

 * Pou (video game): nominated at AfD; notified 23:53, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: I definitely don't believe this passes WP:GNG. Most of the sources used are completely unreliable just from a single glance, and I can't find anything reliable covering it apart from a review by Engadget.