User:Jushe1234/Layered intrusion/LazerRocDoc Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Jushe1234


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jushe1234/Layered_intrusion?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Layered intrusion

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead

- N/A (No change to the lead, a new sub section was created)

Content

- The content is relative to the topic

- The content of the article is very up to date. The oldest source is from 2008 and most are from the last couple years.

- The content appears to be comprehensive with nothing obvious missing. Also, there is not any content that does not belong.

- The article does not deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps.

Tone and Balance

- The content is neutral.

- There are no claims representing a bias.

- There are no over or underrepresented view points.

- The added content does not attempt to sway the reader in any particular direction. Just scientific facts.

Sources and References

- The new information is backed up by numerous reliable sources.

- The information represented in the article appears to accurately reflect those found in the given sources.

- The sources are very through, they come from diverse contributors and reliable sources.

- As mentioned earlier, the sources are very current. Most are within the last few years and the oldest is from 2008.

- The sources are rom a diverse group of journals, studies, and authors.

- These are high quality, peer reviewed sources (in almost all cases)

- The hyperlinks for sources work.

Organization

- The content is clear and concise, however, the flow within paragraphs is occasionally cumbersome.

- There are a few spelling mistakes (the most notable is chromitite (written is chormitite) and few grammatical mistakes (I'm not sure they're mistakes or just grammatical preferences).

- It almost feels like there maybe should be subheadings? I'm not really sure. But the flow between paragraphs feels a little disjointed.

Images and Media

- The article includes now images or media.

- All other points within this subheading are N/A

Overall Impressions

- The contributions have improved the overall quality of Layered Intrusion.

- The strengths of this article are that it is extremely well sourced and is very concise.

- In my opinion, the content could be improved by trying to improve flow within paragraphs and between them so that it doesn't feel so.. blocky? I also wonder if an image highlight mineral occurrence within a layered intrusion might help readers gain a frame of reference for what is being discussed. Overall I think this contribution is high quality and only minor changes need to be made.