User:Just12inn/Misogyny/Chumbina Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Just12inn


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * There is no current draft written for this user, so I will be peer reviewing based on things I think my peer could add or edit from their article: Misogyny


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Misogyny

Evaluate the drafted changes
No current drafted changes.

Lead
The lead includes an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic. The lead DOES NOT contain a brief description of the article's major sections. The lead is a bit overly detailed, including information that isn't necessary to be included in the lead. Specifically the sentence about the word's origins of popular usage, I think this sentence is not necessary and can be moved to the section of the article specifically about the English Language.

Content
In the Background section, it says, "In parallel to these developments, misogyny was also practiced in more primitive global societies such as the tribes of the Amazon Basin and Melanesia, who did not follow a monotheistic religion. " Here, some content could be added to specifically mention how misogyny was practiced or what it looked like during that time.

Another huge lapse in content of this article is the lack of a compelling stand alone section about internalized misogyny. I think the article talks A LOT about how misogyny mostly comes from men, but it is also deeply perpetuated by women, and the section about this is tiny and exists under the heading of "Psychology" titled "Internalised Misogyny" (ALSO the article includes a typo, it's meant to be spelled Internalized). I think there should be a section about internalized misogyny or just about how women are also perpetuators of misogyny, and it should be it's own section, not just under the Psychology one.

There also seems to be very little under the "Criticism of the Concept" section, and I think this could definitely be developed more.

Tone and Balance
I feel as though the tone is very unbiased for such a controversial topic, so that's good.

I think everything is well represented, but it could help to talk about misogyny in relation to other intersectionalities, like how black or trans women experience misogyny differently.

Sources and References
From what I saw, the citations and references all check out and are up to date.

Organization
I think the grammar and overall structure of the article is good.

Images and Media
All of the images seem to be appropriate to the article and add to it.