User:Just an archaeologist/Maria Plyta/Domino10101 Peer Review

General info
Just an archaeologist
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Just an archaeologist/Maria Plyta
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Maria Plyta

Evaluate the drafted changes
Peer review

Lead

Guiding questions:

The lead has been updated to reflect your new content, only includes information that is in the article, and is concise. However, it contains information that is lacking sources. The description about Plyta’s contribution to film appears biased without any sources, so I think that sticking to her filmography or other information that can be cited might help to keep the tone neutral if there are no sources about her impact. I think it might also be helpful to include more general information about her career so that it better describes the article’s major sections.

Content

Guiding questions:

I’m not sure it’s necessary to say that not much is known about Plyta’s early life, especially if there is no source to cite this information. If this was from your own findings, it should be removed. Overall, the content appears to be up-to-date, as the sources were published within the last three years. This article addresses Wikipedia’s equity gaps, as it is about a woman. It also addresses historically underrepresented populations, as it goes into detail Plyta’s significant impact on the male-dominated film industry. I recommend rephrasing the information at the end of the last paragraph under “Life and Career” to avoid using a direct quotation, as I don’t think it’s necessary to convey the information.

Tone and Balance

The tone of the content appears neutral, but because much of the information isn’t cited it can appear to be biased, such as a sentence under the subsection “Life and Career” which describes what Plytha was known for. Without a citation, this can seem like an opinion.

Sources and References

I think it would be helpful to have at least three more references so that the information comes from a greater variety of sources. I also suggest adding more citations, as there are very few and without them the information does not appear credible. I can’t read the sources because I don’t speak Greek, but I think you might only be citing information at the end of a paragraph. I think it would be better to cite information consistently throughout so that it is more clear where it comes from.

I’m not sure whether the references are reliable secondary sources or whether the authors are historically marginalized individuals because of the language barrier, but if this isn’t the case it would be great to include. The links work. I’m not entirely sure the below source is helpful, as I can’t read it, but it is an article I found through the school’s library and might be helpful.

Szczęsna, Joanna. “Płyta z Przedstawieniem Marii z Dzieciątkiem w Kościele Świętej Trójcy w Strzelnie.” Roczniki Humanistyczne, vol. 61, no. 4, 2013, pp. 51–79.

Organization

Guiding questions:

Overall, the content is well-written, organized, and chronologically ordered. I think there is a slight mistake in the second line of the subsection “Early life”. “VERNADOU” is written after adulthood, which looks like it shouldn’t be there. The subheading “Life and Career” isn’t in the standard font, and I think the information could just go under “Career” to fit standard Wikipedia formatting. There is also a table under “Filmography” which appears incomplete, as the only information listed is “1972”. Maybe this could be filled in or removed.

Overall impressions

This content helps to provide more information about Plyta’s personal life, career, and impact. However, I think the information is not as helpful as it could be without a variety of reliable resources. I recommend adding more citations and sources to that this information is credible and is not removed from Wikipedia.