User:Justforasecond/deeceevoice

Incivility/Refusal to take part in mediation
Deeceevoice has a history of incivility which even her supporters acknowledge.

Recently, I asked her to please be more civil and try to include citations. She deleted my comments and left remarks on my page telling me not to contact her again. This makes it nearly impossible to conduct any sort of dispute resolution. Her edit comments said things like "removed annoying clutter", "deleted vandalism" and "deleted without reading". My comments were by no means vandalism.    

Her comments on my talk page were labeled "Don't bother", etc. She also claimed all her edits are factual and refused to AGF -- "I'll assume good faith when the blatant ignorance and racism stop" and finally "One more thing. DO NOT tamper with my talk page...I've deleted your changes -- your last contribution without reading it. (Poof!) Don't waste your time.". These show an utter lack of interest in negotating disputes.   

User Matt Crypto had a similar interaction with her. After her comment "Ha! Get a life, no-name" (and an observance of her history), Matt stated "I think most people would consider that remark uncivil, at the least. Why do you think the rules don't apply to you? Noone's asking you to be best chums with everyone you meet, deeceevoice responded by deleting the thread with edit summary Deleted annoying clutter from MY talk page

A Request for Comment was filed to which she did refused to respond, stating on her talk page "it amazes me that people have nothing better to do on this website than play Miss Manners with other adults like prissy, pedantic, insufferable, niggling, mealy-mouthed, self-righteous, tattletale brats.". At first appearances this may have looked like a solitary tirade, but deeceevoice edited the original comment several times, adding commments like ''But take your RfC and -- well ... I think you get the idea'' and refining her description of users that file RfCs to include "niggling" and "self righteous"    

The initial RFC included comments that she had made to editors in good standing (I'll leave it as a resource rather than paste quotes and diffs). Her remarks to less-than-squeaky (or downright antagonistic/vandal) editors are far worse. For instance, at she says "not nearly half as much as your daddy loves your teeny, weenie weenie ( =D ) (No balls -- gutless coward :p )...And the same goes for the skewered weenies on my talk page. Boring. And really, really pink. (Crakkkah, puh-leeze!) Yawn. *x*". The use of the ethnic slur "crakkka" or variants thereof appear in other deeceevoice's comments, as does her negative attitude towards "pink" (caucasion/white) flesh. She has made other comments about genital size as well.

Numerous editors agreed that deeceevoice has violated wikipedia policies. Even many of her supporters agreed with this, though often not on the RfC page.

After her continued refusal to respond, I filed a Request For Arbitration. You have probably all seen how this went.