User:Justinsj/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article

 * (Economic history)
 * This is article is related to a course that I am studying. The information in this article is also very interesting in terms of how the study of Economics has grown over the years.

Lead evaluation
The lead is included with an introductory sentence that would give the reader a clear understanding of the topic. It properly defines the study of economic history and provides the reader with a clear paragraph of the information that is available throughout the article.

Content evaluation
The article's content is relevant to the study of Economic history and was last edited on September 11th, 2019. The article up to date and is not missing any information or has any information in the content that is irrelevant to the topic.

Tone and balance evaluation
The tone in this article appears to be neutral with no sign of bias in the content. The viewpoint of economic history in the United States is overly represented in the article than the description of economic history in other countries. The article makes no attempt to persuade the reader in any of the sections.

Sources and references evaluation
All of the information that is not original is cited and linked to a working source. All of the sources are connected to the topic of economic history in some sort. Not all of the sources are current, but they do provide relevant information to the time that the text refers to.

Organization evaluation
The article on Economic history is well written and wroten in a way that people at any level interested in the history of economics will be able to understand. There are no grammatical errors or spelling errors in this article. The article is well organized and broken down into necessary sections for each point made.

Images and media evaluation
There is only one image in the article. The image is captioned well and does not violate any of Wikipedia's copyright guidelines. The image could be bigger and the use of more images could be better to show a better illustration of economic history.

Talk page evaluation
The talk page primarily consists of other editors giving suggestions on how to clean the article and giving the editors suggestions. The article has been said to be missing some information on other important parts in economic history.

Overall evaluation
Overall, this is a strong article that resembles a good understanding of Economic history and has a clear definition of the topic. The article is missing some information on other viewpoints of economic history outside of the Unite States and could use more visuals in the article, but overall it is well put together. In the end, the article is well-developed with only a few corrections recommended.