User:JusttheletterE/Bilbo's rain frog/GracePhiri3750 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

JusttheletterE


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:JusttheletterE/Bilbo's_rain_frog?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Bilbo's rain frog

Evaluate the drafted changes
Peer review of article Bilbo's Rain Frog by GracePhiri3750

The is good in explaining the type of species being discussed in the article, however more could be said about the article's major sections especially those relating to animal's behaviour. This would give a good balance and overview of the whole article, as there is more information that describes the fog and the history of the species.

The content added is relevant to the topic and each section builds up well too. The sections are well organized and the tone is neutral. The content is up to date and the information added makes the article detailed. I like how the content does not try to persuade the reader in favour of one position or away from another but still provides adequate details to be well informed about the topic.

A big portion of the articles information relies on information newsletter webpages. Reference 1 is used 16 times which may lead to an unbalanced article since most information is based on one point of view. It's great that there aren't unsourced statements.

The content added is very easy to read with no grammatical or spelling errors. The article could use images that help understand the topic better especially with sections talking about behaviour and mating.

The content added definitely makes the article more complete and brings a good structure to it.