User:Jval730/sandbox

"Article Evaluation" Collector's Club of Chicago - Everything in article seems to be relevant to the topic but a large portion of the article is simply a list of publications that are related to the club and that distracted me. - The article does appear to be unbiased and neutral and simply state veritable "facts" except for some articles that seem to be written by members of said club that were cited. -I believe a viewpoint that is underrepresented in the article is the overall impact of this institution within the general community and what kind of effect it has had. -All the links I checked on this particular page worked and seem to represent all the claims in the article. -I did notice that a few of the references were from books written by people associated with the actual institution so I would have to surmise that these sources couldn't be completely neutral, that bias is not noted. -I definitely think that this page could be added to as they do not really give much insight into current use and recent history of the club at all. - In the talk section there is not any conversations about how to represent this topic, but I did add a question as food for thought! - the article is rated as start class quality which signifies that it is developing but not complete by any means. I would definitely agree with that evaluation. - The article is within the scope of wiki project Chicago which aims to improve all of the articles dealing with the local area. -The lead section could definitely be stronger in my estimation and I think it could have a more clear and concise message as to exactly what the Collector's Club of Chicago is and what it does. The article does skim the surface but doesn't really go into much specific detail. -This article seems to hit the parameters for the way these articles are supposed to be written as far as neutrality,general format and what constitutes a "good" Wikipedia article but it is simply lacking content and probably is a good candidate to be expanded upon.Jval730 (talk) 05:19, 1 February 2018 (UTC)