User:Jweave23/Gymnocarpium dryopteris/Enguyen27 Peer Review

General info
Jweaver23
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Jweave23/Gymnocarpium dryopteris
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Gymnocarpium dryopteris

Evaluate the drafted changes
The lead has the new added information about the plant that was drafted in the sandbox by my peer. The article's lead is clear with its topic, in both versions of the article; my peer's addition and the actual Wiki article. The article's lead goes through some of the main points of the article, a change to the lead could be that it could lightly touch upon all of the topics rather than just some of them. As well, the lead from my peer discusses about spores while the lead from the main article as talks about spores. In order for the lead to not repeat to two statements about spores can either be combined or one will have to go. When it comes to content. the added content looks to be relevant and up-to-date with the plant. The content that has been added does not seem to be biased at all, it is completely neutral in the stance that it takes. All the content is, is about new information about the plant that was not on the main wiki article; there is no personal opinion about the plant anywhere in the added material. The soruces are listed in the reference, so the new information is backed up. All the sources seem to be pretty old, but the links for the articles work. The content is very well organized and clear with the information that it is telling. The two images that got added to the article are also very helpful in understanding the added material. Overall, the added content does help the article in having the readers have a better understanding about the plant, the biggest improvements are the additional pictures and the clear paragraphs. There would be just a couple of small changes made that were discussed earlier in the review.