User:Jwing11/Atropos/Jazmyn Conrad Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? Jwing11
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: User:Jwing11/Atropos

Peer Review
Hey Justin, I think what you have so far is good and quite neutral. I believe it is relevant, and the only thing I would say is site your sources as you go (even though I know it's just a draft and you're just putting it in there for reference).

Lead

Guiding questions:

Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? Yes

Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes

Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? Yes

Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? Yes

Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? Yes

Lead evaluation 5/5

Content

Guiding questions:

Is the content added relevant to the topic? Yes

Is the content added up-to-date? Yes

Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? Most likely more could be added.

Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics? Yes

Content evaluation 3/4

Tone and Balance

Guiding questions:

Is the content added neutral? Mostly

Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No

Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? No

Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No

Tone and balance evaluation 3/4

Sources and References

Guiding questions:

Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Yes

Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? Yes

Are the sources current? Yes

Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible? No

Check a few links. Do they work? Yes

Sources and references evaluation 4/5

Organization

Guiding questions:

Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Yes

Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? No

Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Yes

Organization evaluation 3/3

Images and Media

Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media No

Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? No

Are images well-captioned? No

Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? No

Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? No

Images and media evaluation 0/4

Overall evaluation 8/10