User:Jxl1734/Operation Peter Pan/Mbm002 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Jxl1734


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Jxl1734/Operation Peter Pan
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Operation Peter Pan

Evaluate the drafted changes
- The information added to the lead is both concise and explanatory. It is not overly detailed but reflects the content of the rest of the article.

- The organization of the article in general looks really good. It is divided into sections that make it easy to read and navigate but with enough content for each.

- The content is all relevant and up to date, filling in many missing gaps from the original article. It is very well balanced providing information that is neutral as well as the opinions for and against the operation equally. The information seems to be backed up. Maybe it would help to have one more source to bolster it a bit more. The sections are all well written, concise, and easy to read, I did not find any grammatical or spelling errors.

- The content added makes the article much more complete, greatly improving its quality.