User:Jxlong/Sociology of language/Jacobzzzzzz Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Jxlong


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Sociology of language


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Sociology of language

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

-The content is relavant to the topic and up to date. Since everything is related so no content is missing or not belong.

-The content is neutual and almost all of them are the description of Sociology of language.

-The source is reliable and current. The chosen of sourse is thorough, and the content do reflect the the sources.

-The organization is not great. It is a little bit hard to read. But the gramma and spelling are all good.

-Images do not enhance understanding of the topic, but is visually appealing.

-The overall impression is pretty good as an introduction of the Sociology of language. But the content is a little short and it is hard for me to relate this to linguistic injustice, which is away from our main topic. Maybe add some information on this part.