User:Jxlong/User:Cmalves24/Linguistic Injustice/Darr320 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Linguistic Warriors


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Cmalves24/Linguistic Injustice
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

The lead is detailed but a bit too long. It gives a lot of information about what linguistic injustice is and its history. I think the second paragraph is unnecessary and can be shortened and combined with the first paragraph.

Overall, the article is very detailed and shows many of the effects linguistic injustice has but I think it lacks references and sources. The 'Epistemic Authority' and 'Implications' sections have no sources cited. I think more sources should be used to justify explanations or add examples. The tone of the article is neutral.