User:Jxlong/User:Cmalves24/Linguistic Injustice/Jacobzzzzzz Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Cmalves24


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Cmalves24/Linguistic Injustice


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * User:Cmalves24/Linguistic Injustice

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

-The article is clear and relevant to the topic of linguistic injustice.

-The sources are current and reliable.

-The tone is pretty neutral to me.

-The part of epistemic academy is underrepresented as it lackes sourses to prove the importance of epistemic academy.

-The organization is not hard to follow. Seperation in paragraphs is great.

-The content added improved the quality of the article but some part like Epistemic Authority and Implications supposed to have more citation to make it more evident.

-The whole article is extremely good with clear structure and neutral tone.