User:Jxlong/User:Cmalves24/Linguistic Injustice/Paigebodnar Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Linguistic Warriors


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Cmalves24/Linguistic Injustice


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * n/a

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead-strong, broad lead

-no reference to subsections in lead

-concise lead

Content

-relevant and up-to-date

-missing epistemic authority, assuming this will become part of the larger article from the smaller article

-missing sources in large sections/specific references. topics broad and overview whole subject.

Tone & Balance

-content is neutral to a point-subject is political so it does neutrally assess and explain a social justice issue.

-"These oppressive labels cause the exclusion of non-English speakers from the cultural goods that have been created and cemented around English."--this is a bit biased but not but should have a source if this claim is going to be put up.

Sources

-missing sources in large parts of this article

-some sources unreliable/ misplaced: https://worldresearchranking.com/ link should be added to words in article or should be left alone in the bibliography section and linked to with its number 4 correspondant

-content is easy to read and understandable for non-experts

-no visible grammar/spelling errors aside from ones listed above

-well organized

-no images

-meets new article requirements