User:Jyescas/sandbox

The U.S. National Park Service charges visitors entrance fees to all of their parks around the United States. There are other fees that sometimes apply such as parking or facilities use. These fees depend on the funding that the parks receive from the federal government and tend to fluctuate over the years.

Federal Funding
During the period between 1988 and 2003, federal funding for the national parks increased, but mandates took up more of the budget. These mandates included the Endangered Species Act, other EPA acts, and health and safety regulations. This left money in the budget for park maintenance. During the period between 2005 and 2014, federal funding from Congress declined by 8%. While government funding decreased during this time, other funding from donations, sponsors, fees, and other sources increased by 39%.

Funding for the year 2016
The National Parks Service has resorted to other sources of funding besides the government as they need $12 billion for overdue maintenance projects. The National Parks Service has turned to companies for donations and sponsorships for these projects. The National Parks Service then began waiving policies in order to raise more money, including a policy in which the National Parks Service could not partner with alcohol companies and another which prohibited park vehicles to have corporate logos as ads on them. While in office, Obama called for an increase in spending on the parks because of the threat of climate change, but the current administration may repeal this decision. Congress fought against Obama's choice to defend the national parks, but Obama was successful in stopping 265 million acres of land and water from being developed or destroyed.

Annual Pass
Access to National Parks and Federal Recreation Lands requires either a yearly pass or an entrance fee in order to access their facilities. Annual Passes to these areas are $80 per person, while Daily Passes vary from park to park. U.S. Military members are eligible for a free annual pass. Other reduced prices offered include a Senior Lifetime Pass for only $10, a free access pass for people with disabilities, and a free annual pass for fourth grade children. These Annual Passes give the user access to any of the 2,000 parks or lands and includes any entrance fees that the facilities might charge.

National Park Week
During National Park Week, which celebrates 100 years of the National Parks Service, Yellowstone National Park and Glacier National Park offered free admission.

Entrance Fees by Park
The following fees are all valid for 7 days in the park with entrance via vehicle, motorcycle, or on foot or bike.

Accessibility for People of Color
Many national parks have been dedicated to minority groups like Native Americans and Native Hawaiians as well as sites specifically for the remembrance and acknowledgment of historical landmarks for minority groups like Brown v. Board of Education. However, the demographic information of national parks visitors doesn't represent the demographics of the United States. This persists despite that the parks are very diverse in location, size, and purpose. Theories conclude that minority groups may not be visiting national parks due to economic barriers like access to cars for travel or time and freedom for leisure activities. There also may be discrimination in attending these parks and going to National Parks and participating in nature leisure is seen as "white", so these groups may not feel comfortable exploring the parks.

Current Accessibility Information
The higher the median family income, the more likely the family is to travel to foreign places, but the less likely they are to visit National Parks. This income disparity in national park usage implies that lower income families cannot afford an expensive vacation abroad so they go to nearby National Parks instead.

Under the Trump Administration
Trump directly targeted the National Parks System and their National Parks Service Twitter account after they tweeted about the issue of climate change. Accessibility to national parks can decrease during this administration because President Trump has threatened to defund the National Parks Service. This would cause the National Parks to become more expensive to visit, through increase in entrance or yearly fees, or in some cases even shutting down National Parks. Our national parks are becoming increasingly vulnerable to destruction as climate change will negatively impact the ecosystems of many of our National Parks. President Trump and his administration stand by the idea that climate change is a hoax. By denying concrete evidence of a social media account from our National Parks System, the President is creating a very dangerous precedent for the safety and prosperity of our nation's ecosystems. President Donald Trump and Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke are focusing on the nation's infrastructure repairs rather than the environment or National Parks. President and CEO of the National Parks Conservation Association Theresa Pierno wrote a letter to the editor in the Saint Louis Post-Dispatch discussing her disgust in the funding of infrastructure repair over national parks repairs. She calls upon the current administration to, "make funding our national parks a priority again," as well as cites the $12 billion infrastructure repair backlog that the National Parks System now faces.

The Congressional Review Act, only successfully invoked once before, is now being used again to overturn a variety of rules issued under the Obama administration. On March 6, the Senate used a Congressional Review Act vote in the house to repeal an effort by the Bureau of Land Management to attempt to improve our national parks. The ruling that was overturned, known as Planning 2.0, was the a long-overdue modernization of the Bureau of Land Management's management of our national parks. Planning 2.0 included adopting more advanced technology, such as utilizing Geographic Information System mapping. The Congressional Review Act's conservative policies allows congress to either accept or reject the new rule, so the Bureau of Land Management now has to go back to their prior planning rule (Planning 1.0, essentially) last updated over three decades ago in 1983. Bobby McEnaney, Senior Deputy Director of the Western Renewable Energy Project, explains the negative impacts of the CRA: "But with a Congressional Review Act, even if the Bureau of Land Management wanted to make minor modifications in how it plans for change in the future, it may have to go through the Congressional process first for approval. And that means that the Bureau of Land Management would be handcuffed with a framework from 1983, to the point where staff may not even be able to employ modern tools—including now-standard technology like GIS maps or online databases—to inform the public."