User:Jytweve/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.


 * Name of article: [Alter Ego]
 * I was curious about the lifestyles of an alter ego. What examples are used to describe one and why do they exist.

Lead

 * Lead evaluation

The introductory sentence clearly entails what an alter ego is. "An alter ego (Latin for "other I") means alternative self, which is believed to be distinct from a person's normal or true original personality. Finding one's alter ego will require finding one's other self, one with different personality. " It goes on to talk about how alter ego's are a form of fictional literature. The major sections and or key words are character, psychology and hypothetical. Double life and alternate self are not brought up again through out the article. Nor is the lead overly detailed it's perfect. It goes into depth on other examples of alter ego's or someone who can take on one. Actors and or performers are known for taking on persona's for a role.

Content

 * Content evaluation

The origin gives a little back story of how an alter ego's structure came into play. The term [cicero] from 1st century Rome calls it a true friend and or second self. This article was last updated August 31'st, 2020. I wish there was more of a detailed scientific explanation. I would of rather preferred that instead of the definition and history on the word itself. I wish the real meaning of what the word means was evaluated more. Overall no content was missing or looked as if it did not belong. No Wikipedia equity gaps were present nor was there a obvious historical underrepresented populations or topics were seen.

Tone and Balance

 * Tone and balance evaluation

This article is normal with steady viewpoints. Nothing is considered too much or overrepresented/underrepresented.

Sources and References

 * Sources and references evaluation

Links located at the bottom of the article under references work. There's a subheading article titled Superhero Fiction that have major point with links that are accessible as well. Links include categories and references that are up to date. There is also a diverse team of authors since sources are from different journal articles and books.

Organization

 * Organization evaluation

Everything is written clear and grammatically correct. Structure is neat and a table of contents is included.

Images and Media

 * Images and media evaluation

Images include a diagram and actual people. Anton Mesmer and Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde.

Checking the talk page

 * Talk page evaluation

There was no talk page.

Overall impressions

 * I'd rate this article a 7-9 and 10 being the best. I wish there wion of what it means to have an alter ego on a s an actual evaulat4Overall evaluationOptional activity

I'd rate this article 7-9 with 10 being the best. I rate it so high because it had content that I could actually evaluate but I wish for a better definition. The descriptions that's given is good I just want more of an official evaluated definition but it's alright.


 * Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~


 * Link to feedback: