User:K-star/sandbox

Ancient Egyptian Medicine
Research and work on the Ancient Egyptian Medicine wiki article.

Current article contents italicized, new additions unchanged

Article Outline

 * 1	Sources of information
 * 2	Nutrition
 * obesity
 * nutritional diseasess
 * 3	Pharmacology
 * 4	Practices
 * 4.1	Surgery
 * General surgery
 * Circumcision
 * Needle work
 * stitching wounds
 * trephining ( puncturing the skull)
 * Amputations
 * Venesection (blood letting)
 * Diseases of bones and joints (find another section for this)
 * Diseases of the eyes
 * Internal medicine (anatomy )
 * heart and vessels
 * alimentary track (enemas)
 * Urology
 * parasitic infections
 * Schistosomiasis or bilhaziasis
 * Filariasis
 * Round Worms
 * Tape Worms
 * Other Worms
 * Malaria
 * Bacterial and Viral infections
 * tuberculosis
 * tetanus
 * Poliomyelitis
 * Osteomyelitis
 * Small pox
 * 4.2	Dentistry
 * Dental abscesses
 * Extraction
 * Tooth Transplant
 * Remidies
 * 4.3 Gynecology and obstetrics
 * Contraceptives
 * pregnancy
 * giving birth
 * 4.4 Treatment
 * Splints and Casts
 * 5	Magic and religion
 * 6	Doctors and other healers
 * Influence of ancient Egyptian medicine on other civilizations
 * Influence of ancient Egyptian medicine on other civilizations

Helpful Sources

Ancient Egyptian Medicine by John F. Nunn

Article Evaluation: Gertrude Crotty Davenport == Questions to answer per week 5 ===


 * Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
 * There is nothing in the article that distracted me and everything is relevant but the article is very small.
 * Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?
 * Currently there is only 2 small paragraphs about her, her achievements and impacts need to be added.
 * What else could be improved?
 * The article overall needs more information. Topics such as why she got into the field, her impact, and any controversial issues should be added. Pictures of her and more detailed biography should also be added.
 * Is the article neutral? Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * The article is very neutral with no bias toward any one person. There is not enough information to show any bias.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * No viewpoints are over-represented but her achievements and background is underrepresented.
 * Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?
 * The citation links work but some are books that are not view-able unless purchased.
 * Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?
 * Each fact is referenced well. For a short two paragraph section there are 4 sources and many referenced facts.
 * There could be a bias with the reference "Review: Breeding Contempt: The History of Coerced Sterilization in the United States. By Mark A. Largent", but I need to look into this source further.

Now take a look at how others are talking about this article on the talk page.


 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
 * There are no conversations on the talk page.
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
 * The article is rated a stub class and it is a part of the following WikiProjects: WikiProject Biography / Science and Academia	(Rated Stub-class) WikiProject Women scientists	(Rated Stub-class, Low-importance) WikiProject Animals	(Rated Stub-class, Low-importance)  WikiProject United States	(Rated Stub-class, Low-importance).
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?
 * We have not discussed Gertrude Crotty Davenport in class much. This article is very minimal and she is underrepresented, just as we talked about women is science to be in class.

Article Evaluation: Anthropological Society of London == Questions to answer per week 5 ===


 * Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
 * The formatting of the quotes was distracting.
 * Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?
 * Hunt's other extreme anthropological views, other controversies in the 1960's, and how his relationship with the Ethnological Society of London suffered.
 * How did the rest of the society view science and politics, separate from Hunt?
 * Why the the objective of the society shifted?
 * Other members in the society and their involvement.
 * How the society changed after Hunt's death.
 * What else could be improved?
 * There seems to be a direct quote from Dr. James Hunt that should be cited in the text differently.
 * More information about the society as a whole.
 * A better explanation of Polygenism versus monogenism.
 * Is the article neutral? Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * Currently the article is focused on Hunt's racial views. The previous authors kept most of the page neutral with only needing a few syntactical changes.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * The majority of the article is about Dr. James Hunt's racist ideals.
 * Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?
 * There was a god use of citations. All of the links worked and were relevant to the information presented.
 * Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?
 * The sources seem to be credible and most facts and assertions have sources linked to them, though there are a few that do not.

Now take a look at how others are talking about this article on the talk page.


 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
 * There are no conversations on the talk page.
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
 * This is a Start-Class article that is a part of the WikiProject Anthropology, WikiProject Organizations, and WikiProject London.
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?
 * We have not discussed this topic in class yet.

Article Evaluation: == Questions to answer per week 6 ===

K-star (talk) 17:03, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Article Selected and why.
 * Article: Annie Russell Maunder
 * I chose this article because while there is information about her astrological research, other parts of the article are lacking. This article is also a start class article.
 * What do you want to change?
 * I want to add more information about who she is, what type of person she was, and what motivated her.
 * Sources
 * Brück, Mary T.; Grew, S. (1996) The family background of Annie D. Maunder (née Russell
 * This article is on IsisCB
 * Brück, Mary T. (1994) Alice Everett and Annie Russell Maunder, torch bearing women astronomers.
 * Obligatory Amateurs: Annie Maunder (1868–1947) and British Women Astronomers at the Dawn of Professional Astronomy"
 * 1916 November 10 meeting of the Royal Astronomical Society, The Observatory 39 (1916), 492.
 * J Amos, UK's forgotten woman astronomer honoured, BBC News (25 June 2018).
 * Annie Maunder: Plaque for 'forgotten woman' of science, BBC News Northern Ireland (23 May 2018).
 * https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-northern-ireland-44225256
 * Annie Russell Maunder, Royal Museums Greenwich.
 * https://www.rmg.co.uk/discover/explore/annie-russell-maunder
 * M Bailey, Women and the RAS: 100 Years of Fellowship, Astronomy & Geophysics 57 (1) (2016), 19-21.
 * H Briggs, Chasing the Sun: The woman forgotten by science, BBC News (5 October 2016).
 * https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-37496677
 * M T Brück, Alice Everett and Annie Russell Maunder, torch bearing women astronomers, Irish Astronomical Journal 21 (1994) 280-291.
 * M T Brück and S Grew, The Family Background of Annie S D Maunder (née Russell), Irish Astronomical Journal 23 (1996), 55-56.
 * S Dalla and L Fletcher, A pioneer of solar astronomy, Astronomy & Geophysics 57 (5) (2016), 5.21-5.23.
 * P Devlin, Annie Scott Dill Maunder (1868-1947): Solar Scientist, Hidden Gems and Forgotten People.
 * http://www.hidden-gems.eu/tyrone%20-%20maunder.pdf
 * Edward Walter Maunder and Annie Scott Dill Maunder: papers, Royal Greenwich Observatory Archives.
 * M A Evershed, Annie Scott Dill Maunder, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 108 (1) (1948), 48-49.
 * M A Evershed, Obituary: Mrs Walter Maunder, Journal of the British Astronomical Association 57 (6) (1947), 238.
 * Ireland's Greatest Woman Inventor - Annie Maunder, pioneering astronomer, Presbyterian Historical Society of Ireland.
 * http://www.presbyterianhistoryireland.com/history/annie-maunder/ A S D Maunder, Note on Observations of the Total Solar Eclipse of 1901 May 18, Made at Pamplemousses, Mauritius, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London 69 (1901-1902), 261-266.
 * M B Ogilvie, Obligatory Amateurs: Annie Maunder (1868-1947) and British Women Astronomers at the Dawn of Professional Astronomy, British Journal for the History of Science 33 (2000), 67-84.
 * M B Ogilvie, Maunder, Annie Scott Dill Russell, in T Hockey, V Trimble and T R Williams (eds.), Biographical Encyclopedia of Astronomers (Springer Publishing, New York, 2014).

Annie Russell Maunder Article Evaluation
Research and work on the Annie Russell Maunder wiki article.

Original article copied from Annie Russell Maunder article
Annie Scott Dill Russell was born in 1868 in The Manse, Strabane, County Tyrone, Ireland, to William Andrew Russell and Hessy Nesbitt Russell (née Dill). Her father was the minister of the Presbyterian Church in Strabane until 1882. She received her secondary education at the Ladies Collegiate School in Belfast, which later became Victoria College.Winning a prize in an 1886 intermediate school examination, she was able to sit the Girton open entrance scholarship examination, and was awarded a three-year scholarship.

She studied at Cambridge University (Girton College) and in 1889 she passed the degree examinations with honours, as the top mathematician of her year at Girton, and ranked Senior Optime (equivalent to second class at other universities) in the university results list. However the restrictions of the period did not allow her to receive the B.A. degree she would otherwise have earned.

Edited Article
Annie Scott Dill Russell was born in 1868 in The Manse, Strabane, County Tyrone, Ireland to William Andrew Russell and Hessy Nesbitt Russell (née Dill). Her father was the minister of the Presbyterian Church in Strabane until 1882. Her mother was the daughter of a minister at the same church. Annie was one of six children brought up in a devoutly Christian household with a “serious minded upbringing." All of the children were talented, high-level academics. Her older sister, Hester Dill Russell (later Smith), studied medicine under Dr. Elizabeth Garrett Anderson at the London School of Medicine for Women. Hester qualified as the first exhibitioner in the final MB examination in 1891. Hester became a medical missionary in India and later married another medical missionary.

Annie and her sister Hester pursued secondary education at the Ladies Collegiate School in Belfast, also known as Girton College, Cambridge, which later became Victoria College. Winning a prize in an 1886 intermediate school examination at the age of 18, Annie was able to sit the Girton open entrance scholarship examination and was awarded a three-year scholarship of £35 annually.

Annie studied at Cambridge University (Girton College), and in 1889 she passed the degree examinations with honors, as the top mathematician of her year at Girton. Here, she also ranked Senior Optime (equivalent to second class at other universities) in the university results list. Her mathematician tutor was a fellow of a men’s college. He praised her for ability to “throw herself into her work with such success, in spite of being more than ordinarily handicapped, even for a woman, with insufficiency of preliminary training". However the restrictions of the period did not allow her to receive the B.A. degree she would likely otherwise have earned.

Original article copied from Annie Russell Maunder article
Walter and Annie had no children together, although Walter had five children from a previous marriage. Annie was 17 years younger than Walter and only nine years older than his oldest son. Annie was described as having an active mind and a "lively imagination was combined with a tireless zeal in seeking evidence and working out details before presenting any conclusions” .Walter died in 1928 at the age of 76 . Annie died almost two decades later, aged 79, in Wandsworth, London in 1947.

Edited Article
Annie, aged 27, married Walter, aged 45, in a Presbyterian church in Greenwich on December 28th, 1895. Walter and Annie had no children together; although, Walter had five children from a previous marriage. Annie was 17 years younger than Walter and only nine years older than his oldest son. The oldest of the children was 21 and the youngest was 7. Annie was described as having an active mind and a "lively imagination combined with a tireless zeal in seeking evidence and working out details before presenting any conclusions” . Walter died in 1928 at the age of 76 . Annie died almost two decades later, aged 79, in Wandsworth, London in 1947.

Original article copied from Annie Russell Maunder article
==Astronomical research== In 1891, Russell began work at the Greenwich Royal Observatory, serving as one of the "lady computers" assigned to the solar department at a salary of four pounds per month. This was a special department set up in 1873 to photograph the sun. There, Russell assisted Walter Maunder, and she spent a great deal of time photographing the sun. The solar maximum of 1894 resulted in a high number of sunspots, the movements of which Russell also tracked.

Maunder and Russell were married in 1895, and Annie was required to resign from her job due to restrictions on married women working in public service. However, the two continued to collaborate, and Annie accompanied Walter on solar eclipse expeditions. In 1897, Annie received a grant from Girton College to acquire a short-focus camera with a 1.5-inch lens which she took on expeditions. She used this camera to photograph the outer solar corona from India in 1898.

In 1900 Russell, along with other members of the British Astronomical Association, traveled to Algiers to observe the total eclipse of the sun on the 28th of May of that year. The members of the association that accompanied Russell were Mary Acworth Evershed, Lilian Martin-Leake and C. O. Stevens.

Annie published The Heavens and their Story in 1908, with her husband Walter as co-author. (She was credited by her husband as the primary author.) The book contains her photographs of the sun and the Milky Way. She was elected as a Fellow of the Royal Astronomical Society in November 1916, ten months after the bar on female Fellows was lifted. She had first been nominated for election 24 years earlier. Earlier she had become a member of the British Astronomical Association, which her husband had helped found in 1890. Although he had been fellow of the Royal Astronomical Society since 1875, Maunder wanted an association of astronomers open to every person interested in astronomy, from every class of society, and especially open for women.

She returned to the Royal Greenwich Observatory as a volunteer during World War I, working there from 1915 to 1920. Many of her observations were published in popular journals under her husband's name before she was named as a Fellow of the Royal Astronomical Society.

The investigations of the Maunders demonstrated a correlation between the variation in sunspot numbers and the climate of the Earth, leading to the discovery that the period of decreased solar activity during the Maunder Minimum. Annie was regarded as an expert in eclipse photography and was asked to take charge of photography of the Canadian Government's eclipse expedition to Labrador in August 1905. This was the only time her expenses were paid for a scientific expedition; the weather ended up being cloudy and no eclipse observations were taken.

Annie at the Royal Astronomical Society
In January of 1890, Annie was told about a position at Greenwich that was available by her good friend Alice Everett. In response, Annie wrote many times to the Royal Observatory hoping to be considered for the position. Annie's father submitted a request for her to obtain the job, and a powerful promoter, Sir Robert Ball, wrote her a letter of recommendation. For a year, Annie worked as a mathematics mistress at the Ladies’ High School on the island of Jersey until she was offered the position by the Chief Assistant, Herbert Hall Turner. In 1891, Annie began her work at the Greenwich Royal Observatory, serving as one of the "lady computers" assigned to the solar department. This was a special department set up in 1873 to photograph the sun. Annie was offered £4 a month which she regarded as being barely enough to live off of. As a teacher she had made £80 a year and was given a place to live for free. Annie worked under Walter Maunder on the Greenwich photoheliograph program. Her duties included using the Dallmeyer photo-heliograph to capture pictures of sunspots, find their location, and determine their properties. There, Annie assisted Walter Maunder, and she spent a great deal of time photographing the sun. She also tracked the movements of a great number of sunspots caused by the solar maximum of 1894. This included the giant sunspot of July 1892 which was caused by a magnetic storm resulting in the largest spot ever record at Greenwich at the time. In her first year at Greenwich (1891), the number of recorded observations in the solar department exceeded 7 times the average number of recordings for the past 35 years. While she was not credited for this, Walter Maunder nominated her for the Fellowship of the Royal Astronomical Society in 1892. In November 1894, she was made editor of the British Astronomical Association (BAA) by her husband who was president at the time. She kept this position for 35 years.

Annie and Walter's Collaboration
Annie and Walter were married in 1895, and Annie was required to resign from her job due to restrictions on married women working in public service. It is believed that “the lady computer scheme began as an experiment, was destined to have a time limit and was not repeated”. Forty years passed before another woman astronomer was hired alongside men at the Royal Observatory. However, the two continued to collaborate, and Annie accompanied Walter on solar eclipse expeditions. Walter was in charge of financing and organizing expeditions through the National Eclipse Committee of the Royal Observatory of Greenwich. Annie took part in five eclipse expeditions with the BAA, her first in 1896 in Norway. For the Maunders expedition to India in 1898, Walter was not an designated member of the expedition, so he and Annie went on their own.

In 1897, Annie received a grant from Girton College to acquire a short-focus camera with a 1.5-inch lens which she took on expeditions. The lens used was made by T.R. Dallmeyer, a famous London optician. She used this camera to photograph the outer solar corona from India in 1898. With this camera she captured the longest ray, coronal streamer, seen at the time with her own equipment that she operated and designed herself. Her camera was designed with a large field-of-view for photographing the Milky Way, which made it possible to look for faint and distant corona. To take photos of the eclipse, Annie took a series of photographs with her camera and ranging exposures during the couple minutes of the totality of the eclipse. Her photographs recorded a stream from the sun that extended over 10 million kilometers. Royal Society soiree, Agnes Clerke wrote "Mrs. Maunder with her tiny lens has beaten all the big instruments”. Annie's description of the direction and motion of the particles in the corona which she observed, describes the now accepted Parker Spiral structure of the solar wind. In 1900 Annie, along with other members of the BAA, traveled to Algiers to observe the total eclipse of the sun on the May 28th of that year. The members of the association that accompanied her were Mary Acworth Evershed, Lilian Martin-Leake, and C. O. Stevens. She photographed the corona and observed “plume” like rays, coining the term which is still used today. In May of 1901, the Maunders went on a solar expedition in Mauritius in which Annie was not included as an official observer (though her husband Walter was) and had to pay her own way. Since Annie was not an official observer, she decided to go to a separate location to photograph the eclipse. Of the two Mauritius corona photographs that where published, one was Walter's and one was Annie's. The only expedition in which Annie's expenses were paid for was the expedition to Canada where the Maunders were invited and sponsored by the Canadian Government.

The Maunders' Publications
In 1904, Annie and Walter created the butterfly diagram to analyse sunspots, showing the latitude of the sunspots over time. The butterfly diagram “is one of the most powerful representations of the inner workings of the Sun”. The paper originally had two desiccated butterflies but a third was added after the 11 to 12 year course. Annie was not published as coauthor on her husbands paper over the butterfly diagram.

Annie co-authored with her husband on some papers. In 1907, she published a paper covering “an analysis of the formidable sunspot data-set that had been gathered at the ROG, covering 1889–1901” as sole author. This analysis contained data that took 13 years to collect, and 19 tables of results. In this paper she found east-west asymmetries, a controversial finding, in sunspots which she could not explain. Years later, Arthur Schuster, a famous physicist, confirmed her findings and suggested an explanation for the asymmetry. Modern science and data has also confirmed her observations on the asymmetrical nature of the sunspots. Annie published The Heavens and their Story in 1908, with her husband Walter as co-author. (She was credited by her husband as the primary author.) The book was written for the amateur readers, containing her photographs of the sun and the Milky Way, in hopes to draw in more people to the field of astronomy. The book discusses the sudden terrestrial magnetic storms coinciding with the sunspots rotation period which was seen in the 1898 eclipse in India. The Maunders thought that the magnetic storms were made of positively and negatively charged electrified particles, an "insight [that] far predates better-known statements on the same matter, and has much in common with our present-day understanding".

Royal Astronomical Society Fellowship
She was elected as a Fellow of the Royal Astronomical Society (RAS) in November 1916,  ten months after the bar on female Fellows was lifted. Earlier, she had become a member of the BAA, which Walter had helped found in 1890. Although he had been fellow of the RAS since 1875, Walter wanted an association of astronomers open to every person interested in astronomy, from every class of society, and especially open for women. Annie had first been nominated for election to the RAS 24 years earlier due strongly in part to Walter's recommendation. Along with her were two additional nominees, Elizabeth Brown and Alice Everett. None of the three women received the three-quarters vote at the April 1892 meeting that was required for election. One Fellow specifically implied that the women would largely serve as a distraction and simply a social element to the meetings without contributing much of worth. Annie did not take lightly to the prejudice against her and other women throughout her field occupied largely by men, and she especially did not agree with the results of the 1892 RAS election.

Original article copied from Annie Russell Maunder article
The crater Maunder on the Moon is jointly named for Walter and Annie Maunder, as is the Maunder Minimum.

In June 2018 it was announced that the Royal Observatory Greenwich has installed a new telescope in its Altazimuth Pavilion, the Annie Maunder Astrographic Telescope (AMAT), as part of a revival of telescopy in London enabled by cleaner air and advanced technology. There is also to be an exhibition about Maunder's story, on the ground floor of the building.

Edited Article
MarinaMueller (talk) 20:53, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

Peer Review Section (3/22)
Please add your peer review comments here.

Peer Review byBritt947 (talk) 15:46, 22 March 2019 (UTC)

 * 1) I am impressed with how much information you have added underneath her astronomical research. I was surprised that there was that much information to add. There are many sources and for some of your information you used more than one reference to site it. I also love how the article is organized.
 * 2) I was a little disappointed that there isn’t information added to any other part of the article. The article is a little uneven with a majority of the information being about her astronomical research. Is there more information in other areas of her life? Those sections look small compared to the astronomical research section.
 * 3) I would check out reference 10. It looks like it might be from a blog so I would make sure that it is a reliable source. It also looks like most of the information in the astronomical research section comes from source 2. You might want to add some more references to back up that one source. Another thing that caught my attention was that there is one section for early life and education and another one on personal life. Could those be combined?
 * 4) Again, I will probably go back through my article and site more than one reference for certain points to make it more reliable. From looking at your article, I have learned that I want to make sure my article is even with its information. --Britt947 (talk) 15:39, 22 March 2019 (UTC)

Peer Review Elwgxf (talk) 15:41, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
 * 1) Astronomical Research
 * The organization is good, very clear and easy to follow.
 * BAA (an acronym?) is used, maybe explain? Upon further reading, it is mentioned, so switch up the order so the first time it is mentioned is the whole name.
 * I would love to know a bit more about what a solar eclipse expedition is, maybe describe that a bit more to give readers more information.
 * The butterfly diagram is “is…”, check grammar/wording.
 * It gets confusing when you use Annie vs Russell, maybe consider one or the other?
 * There is a lot of citing one source, find some more to back it up.
 * Appreciate all the connections to other Wikipedia articles, I need to do more of that!
 * Overall, wonderful additions, all on topic, just needs some polishing.

Elwgxf (talk) 15:41, 22 March 2019 (UTC)

References

Evershed, M. A. (1948). "Annie Scott Dill Maunder". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 108 (1): 48–49. Bibcode:1948MNRAS.108...48.. doi:10.1093/mnras/108.1.48. Retrieved 27 January 2016.

Evershed, M. A. (1947). "Obituary: Mrs. Walter Maunder". Journal of the British Astronomical Association. 57 (6): 238. Bibcode:1947JBAA...57..238. Retrieved 27 January 2016.

Brück, Mary T. (1994). "Alice Everett and Annie Russell Maunder, torch bearing women astronomers". Irish Astronomical Journal. 21: 280–291. Bibcode:1994IrAJ...21..281B.

Brück, Mary T.; Grew, S. (1996). "The Family Background of Annie S. D. Maunder (née Russell)". Irish Astronomical Journal. 23: 55–56. Bibcode:1996IrAJ...23...55B.

Ogilvie, Marilyn Bailey (2000). "Obligatory Amateurs: Annie Maunder (1868–1947) and British Women Astronomers at the Dawn of Professional Astronomy". British Journal for the History of Science. 33: 67–84. doi:10.1017/s0007087499003878.

Ogilvie, Marilyn Bailey (2014). "Maunder, Annie Scott Dill Russell". In Hockey, Thomas; Trimble, Virginia; Williams, Thomas R. Biographical Encyclopedia of Astronomers. New York: Springer Publishing. pp. 1418–1420. doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-9917-7_912. ISBN 978-1-4419-9917-7.

"General Registrar's Office". IrishGenealogy.ie. Retrieved 14 April 2017.

Fletcher, Lyndsay; Dalla, Silvia (2016-10-01). "A pioneer of solar astronomyWOMEN & THE RAS: ANNIE MAUNDER". Astronomy & Geophysics. 57 (5): 5.21–5.23. doi:10.1093/astrogeo/atw181. ISSN 1366-8781.

Brück, Mary T. (1998). "Mary Ackworth Evershed née Orr (1867-1949), solar physicist and Dante scholar". Journal of Astronomical History and Heritage. 1 (1): 45–59.

Maunder, E. Walter (2 July 1900). "The Total Solar Eclipse of May 28, 1900". Knowledge. 23: 145–147 – via Biodiversity Heritage Library.

"1916 November 10 meeting of the Royal Astronomical Society". The Observatory. 39: 479. 1916. Bibcode:1916Obs....39..479., see. p. 492.

Bailey, Mandy (2016). "Women and the RAS: 100 Years of Fellowship" (PDF). Astronomy & Geophysics. 57 (1): 19–21. Retrieved 26 January 2016.

Mulvihill, Mary (2009). Lab Coats and Lace: The Lives and Legacies of Inspiring Irish Women Scientists and Pioneers. p. 80. ISBN 9780953195312. Retrieved 5 June 2013.

Kinder, A. J. (2008-02-01). "Edward Walter Maunder FRAS (1851-1928): his life and times". Journal of the British Astronomical Association. 118: 21–42. ISSN 0007-0297.

Annan, James (6 July 2009). "James' Empty Blog: Who named the Maunder Minimum?". julesandjames.blogspot.com.

Amos, Jonathan (25 June 2018). "UK's forgotten woman astronomer honoured". BBC News. Retrieved 25 June 2018. MarinaMueller (talk) 17:30, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

Article Evaluation: Inca Society
Questions to answer per week 5


 * Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
 * The main points of the article are all related to the main topic.
 * The statement "the Inca Atahualpa commissioned a llawt'u woven from vampire bat hair" seems false and has no citation.


 * Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * The statement "The Inca were a conquering society, and their expansionist assimilation of other cultures is evident in their artistic style" (1), the fact that the Inca were a conquering society hasn't been backed up.
 * Are there viewpoints that are over represented, or underrepresented?
 * The ceramics and metalwork section is very well developed and most of the other sections are underdeveloped.
 * Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?
 * Most of the citation links work. The reference links either do not work or are nonexistent.
 * Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?
 * Most facts are not referenced and are missing sources. It is hard to tell where the author got their information from.
 * Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?
 * More information needs to be added on the entire page.
 * Check out the Talk page of the article. What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
 * Rated as a start-class.
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?

Aztec Medicine Article
Week 7 assignment


 * In your sandbox, write a few sentences about what you plan to contribute to the selected article.
 * I plan to add address the current issues listed in the talk page such as more relevant information about Aztec medicine and creating inline citations.
 * I also plan to expand the cited articles, and reconfigure the headings and sections so that the page reads better and will have enough evidence backing up the statements that the article will no longer be considered a stub article.
 * Think back to when you did an article critique. What can you add? Post some of your ideas to the article's talk page.
 * The sentence "Disease had an ambivalent or dualistic aspect, representing an imbalanced state but at the same time its presence could indicate the existence of a communion with the supernatural world" needs to be cited.
 * There needs to be a section regarding to wound treatment that includes plant types that were used and their effectiveness.
 * Compile a list of relevant, reliable books, journal articles, or other sources. Post that bibliography to the talk page of the article you'll be working on, and in your sandbox. Make sure to check in on the Talk page to see if anyone has advice on your bibliography.
 * Source List/ Bibliography:
 * also an ebook link https://books.google.com/books?id=iT5cww4rQdoC&printsec=frontcover#v=snippet&q=architecture&f=false
 * full open access text https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1033639/pdf/medhist00149-0009.pdf
 * also an ebook link (pg 56-57) https://books.google.com/books?id=YA-cCgAAQBAJ&pg=PA59&lpg=PA59&dq=Aztec+medicine.+F+Guerra&source=bl&ots=13VKigap1D&sig=BO1oqkoM945-Oyod57Wn6yER1gc&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjEjPid3tLWAhXnrlQKHe8tBYwQ6AEITjAL#v=onepage&q=Aztec%20medicine.%20F%20Guerra&f=false
 * also an ebook link (pg 56-57) https://books.google.com/books?id=YA-cCgAAQBAJ&pg=PA59&lpg=PA59&dq=Aztec+medicine.+F+Guerra&source=bl&ots=13VKigap1D&sig=BO1oqkoM945-Oyod57Wn6yER1gc&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjEjPid3tLWAhXnrlQKHe8tBYwQ6AEITjAL#v=onepage&q=Aztec%20medicine.%20F%20Guerra&f=false

Aztec Medicine Article
Week 7 assignment
 * Identify what's missing from the current form of the article. Think back to the skills you learned while critiquing an article. Make notes for improvement in your sandbox.
 * Types of medicine
 * the reason behind the need for developed medicine ( self mutilation, common sickness, etc.)
 * plants used
 * beliefs behind it ( if there were religious beliefs behind how someone healed or was sick)
 * modern-day Nahua medical practices
 * Write an outline of that topic in the form of a standard Wikipedia article's "lead section." Write it in your sandbox.
 * Historical Development
 * Treatments
 * Plants
 * Beliefs
 * Education and Practices
 * Modern-day Practices
 * See also
 * Notes
 * References
 * Sources
 * External Links