User:K1Bond007/Archive13

Force Unleashed
Dear K1Bond007, Shouldn't you at least mention the possibility of a Wii release for this game? To my knowledge, it hasn't even officially been announced for the PS3 and 360- just "Next-Gen Systems".

Even though the footage may have been confirmed as coming from the PS3 and 360, it seems to me that reporting that it's coming out definitively for those two and not saying anything at all about a Wii version after the official "Next-Gen Systems" is a tad irresponsible. Especially if there's gonna be a PS2 version of the game.

I may have missed something somewhere, but I can't find any official word that it will be coming out for any systems other then the PS2, PSP and DS.

Thanks, -Matt —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Omdata (talk • contribs) 19:56, 15 February 2007 (UTC).

Sorry!
Sorry, I couldn't find an author for the article, and I wanted to check with someone who might know something I don't before actually editing the page. Didn't mean to jump up your butt! -Matt

PS-my favorite Bond is Dalton, hands-down, though I love them all :) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Omdata (talk • contribs) 20:35, 15 February 2007 (UTC).

Hey there fellow Bond fan!! I hope you approve but I like articles to have plenty of images to support it so if I can combine some free natural images to identify settings, or vehicles in the films with far use screenshots I reckon we get a better picture for people who don't know the films. Yesterday i added a full missing synopsis to From Russia With Love (film) I hope its okay? Ernst Stavro Blofeld 12:30, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Films February Newsletter
The February 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Cbrown1023 talk 23:09, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

Need sources for the following:
- A Link to the Past (talk) 19:32, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

how can i get a wallpaper size photo of bernard lee?

March WP:FILMS Newsletter
The March 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This is an automated notice by Cbrown1023 talk 00:22, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

Thunderbrand
Just thought you might like to know that Thunderbrand has decided to quit.. You and Thunderbrand were the two people that inspired me to commit myself to Wikipedia. I thought you should know. JACO  PLANE  • 2007-04-13 23:57

WikiProject James Bond
I just thought you'd like to know that I have proposed a WikiProject dedicated to improving Wiki's library of James Bond information. If you're interested, go to the project page and add your name under 'Interested Wikipedians'. Don't be afraid to mention the project to other people you know will want to help. I look forward to starting the project as soon as interest shows itself. Gan fon  01:20, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

Not a propsition now a reality Her eis the project tag

PLease join WikiProject James Bond ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ "Expecting you" Contribs 19:10, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

Welcome I've been expecting you. ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ "Expecting you" Contribs 20:26, 17 April 2007 (UTC)


 * It's about time a Wikiproject came together regarding Bond. I'm not 100% in favor of everything planned (as my comments on the project's talk page indicate) but it's a step in the right direction. Incidentally that old chestnut about Never Say Never being called an unofficial film has erupted again (I think by the same guy who had issue with it last time). I've decided to push the issue by making resolving it an Open Task. 23skidoo 15:56, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

Novel/Movie Differences
I agree that Sean Connery is the best James Bond actor. Recently, you deleted one of my edits (The Man With the Golden Gun Novel). I added the section about how it was different from the movie. You said that it should go on the movie page. I agree, but recently, I tried something similiar on several other Bond movie pages, but I was then told to put it on the novels page so I was not sure whether this section should go on the novel or movie page. Emperor001 21:29, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

Images
Hi there! Where did you get those beautiful images on your userpage? L. Fr@nco 16:01, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I mean this image with the text 007 on your userpage. L. Fr@nco 14:49, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

April 2007 WP:FILMS Newsletter
The April 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This is an automated notice by BrownBot 21:25, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

SPECTRE
You said that Blofeld was on his own in On Her Majesty's Secret Serivce and Diamonds Are Forever. I'm afraid I have to disagree with you on that one. SPECTRE existed until Blofeld died. Below is the explanation I placed on the SPECTRE discussion page.


 * I think that SPECTRE existed from the time Bloefeld founded it until he died. Even though it may not have been as large in its final appearances, it still existed, even in minor forms.  In the novel On Her Magesty's Secret Service, Bond refers to Bloefeld's organization as SPECTRE, even though it is not as large as it was in Thunderball.  I also agree with the above statement about the movie, OHMSS, stating that SPECTRE still existed.  Bond said that it operated world wide, which meant that he couldn't have been wrong about SPECTRE still existing.  If it had collapsed, he would have known it.  Since Bloefeld constantly revived SPECTRE until he died, it can be assumed that SPECTRE's existance continued until Bloefeld met his maker.  Also, the Special Edition DVD box to OHMSS specifically stated that SPECTRE was the villianious organination in the movie.

Emperor001 21:33, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

SPECTRE did exist during On Her Majesty's Secret Service and Diamonds are Forever. I just watch the commentary on the Diamonds are Forever Ultimate Edition DVD and the director of the movie specifically said, "aside from the beginning sequence of For Your Eyes Only, Blofeld and SPECTRE appeared in six of the first seven Bond films." Note, he said "Blofeld and SPECTRE." Granted SPECTRE may not have been as big as it was in previous movies, it still existed just as it did in the novel for OHMSS, it just existed in a smaller form. Further evidence that it still existed is that the producers were going to make SPECTRE and Blofeld the villains in The Spy Who Loved Me, but legal action from Kevin McClory was the only thing that stopped them. In conclusion, SPECTRE existed at least until Diamonds are Forever, and maybe a little while after that, though not as big as before and I think that all James Bond related articles should reflect this. Emperor001 20:29, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

My current status
I've been away from Wiki for the last few weeks and I've decided I'm probably going to stay away except perhaps for some "special request" editing that I have been asked to do by a few people. Aside from the fact that I realized life without Wiki is not only possible but I can actually get quite a bit done, I've run my course of tolerating people who treat me like an amateur or worse, an idiot, regarding certain matters (obviously this does not apply to you in any way, nor does it apply to 99% of the editors I deal with. But it only takes 1% to spoil everything. I've been made aware of a competing Wiki called Citizendium and I've been invited to start afresh and I might do that. But right now I'm simply too tied up with real world issues to devote so much time to a project that doesn't pay me and these days tends to leave me more frustrated than satisified. Obviously if you need support on an issue, please feel free to e-mail me and I'll help out, plus I might lurk here and there (either signed in or not) so I'm not necessarily disappearing completely. Cheers! 23skidoo 16:03, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

Video Games
You said that none of the video games are cannon. I believe that this statement is not true. The only time a video game is non-canonical is if the game contradicts what happens in the films. Since games like Agent Under Fire, Nightfire, and Everything or Nothing (which even had all of the actors from the main movie rolls: Brosnan as Bond, Dench as M, and Cleese as Q) do not contradict the films save the bonuses, they are canonical. Emperor001 21:32, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Canon
Thank you for responding to my comments. But, you said that by saying that games were canonical, so was Never Say Never Again. This is not true. Just so you know, I consider it canon if it does not contradict the movies. NSNA does contradict the EON movies because of characters and organizations that are dead. For example, I consider Everything or Nothing canonical because it doesn't contradict the films (you mentioned Jaws, he could have turned evil again; as I recall in the movies, he was mostly a hit-man for hire). In contrast, Goldeneye: Rouge Agent is not canonical because it obviously contradicts the movies. There are also, different canons. A novel canon, a movie canon "Dr. No to Die Another Day", and the new canon (Casino Royale to present). Just so you know, I am only trying to present my position. I am not arguing.

About SPECTRE, I think it still existed in OHMSS because if you look at the back of the special edition DVD box, it specifically mentioned SPECTRE as the villians.

Once again, just stating my beliefs and why. I'm new at working with other wikipedians, but isn't clearing things like this up a good thing for the articles' sake. For example, with SPECTRE, we have to be consistent about when we say it ended. I think we should say that it ended with Blofeld's death due to the fact that he constantly reformed his organinzation (though not always as extensive as before). Emperor001 16:43, 22 May 2007 (UTC)


 * What about Everything or Nothing. That game was designed to somewhat act as a sequel to A View to a Kill.  The main villian in the game was the apprentice of Max Zorin, the villiam from A View to a Kill.  Also, what about the other standard characters?  They're even voiced by the current actors.  You once mentioned that Jaws turned good.  How do you know that he stayed good?  Something may have pushed him back into being a villian's hit-man.  He only turned good because of his new girlfriend.  Take away her, and he would probably turn evil again.  Emperor001 00:40, 2 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Gotcha. I just thought that it would be canonical since EON had to approve of it to use the characters thus making the game legitimate canon.  Sorry about the frequent messages, I'm just used to arguing points until I am completely proven wrong.  Emperor001 20:46, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Possible nomination for adminship
I noted one of our trusted colleagues, User:Ernst Stavro Blofeld, has been told that he would be a good candidate for adminship. I tend to agree. I was wondering whether you, an admin, would be interested in perhaps sponsoring this person for RfA. If you would care to review his record, please do so and make your decision then. In any event, I think you know better than I do what is required of an admin, and would be a much better person to nominate him if he were to choose to do so. It is possible that he may decline, of course. I know firsthand that delusional homicidal megalomaniacs tend to be easily distracted, and am not honestly sure if the above party would be interested in seeking adminship. Anyway, I would welcome your review of the situation. Thanks. John Carter 19:25, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

May 2007 WP:FILMS Newsletter
The May 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated notice by BrownBot 21:59, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject James Bond
Special Windler  04:05, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:007Moore.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:007Moore.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 02:35, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject James Bond, Collaboration of the Fortnight
 SpecialWindler   talk  00:45, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

June 2007 WP:FILMS Newsletter
The June 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Please also, if you have not already, add your name to the Member List. Nehrams2020 08:24, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

American films
Please please!!! help fill in List of American films. Even if it is just a few details it all helps -any contribution you can make will be more than appreciated!! I've been expecting you!! ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ "Expecting you" Contribs 17:15, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:003JamesBondJunior.jpg
I have tagged Image:003JamesBondJunior.jpg as a disputed use of non-free media, because there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please clarify your fair use rationale on the image description page. Thank you. Qst 19:23, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

Bureaucratship again
Hello! In September 2005 you indicated your desire to be notified if and when I was nominated for bureaucratship again. As per your comment, I'm letting you know that I'm up for bureaucratship for the third and final time at Requests for bureaucratship/Andrevan3, and your opinion would be welcome. It has been a while, so if you're no longer interested, I apologize and understand. Cheers, Andre (talk) 22:08, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Thank you!
Thanks in part to your support, I am Wikipedia's newest bureaucrat. I will do my best to live up to your confidence and kind words. Andre (talk) 09:32, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:007Connery.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:007Connery.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 20:42, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject James Bond
 SpecialWindler   talk  01:50, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject James Bond
 SpecialWindler   talk  01:16, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:007FRWLposter.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:007FRWLposter.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 18:35, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

July 2007 WP:FILMS Newsletter
The July 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This is an automated delivery by BrownBot 18:50, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

Are you sure about the film poster?? It looks like the original 1963 poster to me. The other doesn't look original. ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ "Expecting you?" Contribs 19:34, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

Casino Royale (1967 film)
Hi,

I was wondering if you would vote for this film as the next James Bond Collaboration at WikiProject James Bond/Collaboration of the fortnight.

The film is increasingly viewed as an epic, comic, satire of the whole James Bond genre.

Thanks

Tovojolo 20:12, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:007Brosnan.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:007Brosnan.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Videmus Omnia Talk  15:52, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

Image:007Connery.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:007Connery.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Videmus Omnia Talk  16:03, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

Image:007Lazenby.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:007Lazenby.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Videmus Omnia Talk  16:05, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject James Bond
 SpecialWindler   talk  00:42, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

Image:DavidNiven.jpg
I have tagged Image:DavidNiven.jpg as no rationale, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. Thank you. Videmus Omnia Talk  03:57, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

Image:Bernard_lee.jpg
I have tagged Image:Bernard_lee.jpg as no rationale, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. Thank you. Videmus Omnia Talk  04:14, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

Image:Robert_brown.jpg
I have tagged Image:Robert_brown.jpg as no rationale, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. Thank you. Videmus Omnia Talk  04:15, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

Image:Desmond_llewelyn.jpg
I have tagged Image:Desmond_llewelyn.jpg as no rationale, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. Thank you. Videmus Omnia Talk  04:31, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

Image:John_Cleese.jpg
I have tagged Image:John_Cleese.jpg as no rationale, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. Thank you. Videmus Omnia Talk  04:32, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

Image:007Jaws.jpg
I have tagged Image:007Jaws.jpg as a disputed use of non-free media, because there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please clarify your fair use rationale on the image description page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia Talk  05:27, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

Image:007FRWLvg1.jpg
I have tagged Image:007FRWLvg1.jpg as no rationale, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. Thank you. Videmus Omnia Talk  22:08, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

Image:007FRWLgame.jpg
I have tagged Image:007FRWLgame.jpg as no rationale, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. Thank you. Videmus Omnia Talk  22:09, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

Image:007FRWLvg3.jpg
I have tagged Image:007FRWLvg3.jpg as no rationale, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. Thank you. Videmus Omnia Talk  22:11, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

Image:John_Cleese.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:John_Cleese.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Videmus Omnia Talk  22:20, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

Image:Desmond_llewelyn.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Desmond_llewelyn.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Videmus Omnia Talk  22:25, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

Image:007FRWLvg3.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:007FRWLvg3.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Videmus Omnia Talk  21:51, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject James Bond
 SpecialWindler   talk  02:37, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

August 2007 WP:FILMS Newsletter
The August 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This is an automated delivery by BrownBot 04:09, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject James Bond
  The Windler    talk  03:42, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Films roll call
Hey fellow Wikipedian! Your username is listed on the WikiProject Films participants list, but we are unsure as to which editors are still active on the project. If you still consider yourself an active WP:FILM editor, please add your name to the Active Members list. You may also wish to add   to your userpage, if you haven't done so already. We also have several task forces that you may be interested in joining as well. Also, elections for Project Coordinators are currently in sign-up phase. If you would be interested in running, or would like to ask questions of the candidates, please take a look. You can see more information on the positions at WikiProject Films/Coordinators. Thanks and happy editing! An automatic notification by BrownBot 23:39, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

Please participate, WikiProject James Bond collaboration
<span style="background-color: maroon; color: white;font-family: Trebuchet MS; cursor: crosshair; white-space:nowrap;">  The Windler    talk  05:55, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Films September 2007 Newsletter
The September 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

Please note that special delivery options have been reset and ignored for this issue due to the revamp of the membership list (outlined in further detail in the newsletter). If you would like to change your delivery settings for future issues, please follow the above link. I apologize for the inconvenience. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot 23:19, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

The final WikiProject James Bond collaboration of the fortnight
Thankyou, <span style="background-color: maroon; color: white;font-family: Trebuchet MS; cursor: crosshair; white-space:nowrap;">  The Windler    talk  03:17, 20 October 2007 (UTC).

Preity Zinta FA
Hi there. The Preity Zinta article has recently achieved A-class status. Due to the wealth of support I have decided to now nominate for an FA class article which I believe and judging by the comments of others is pretty much up to. In my view it is better than some existing FA actor articles. I would therefore be very grateful if you could give it a final review in your own time and leave your comments and views at Featured article candidates/Preity Zinta. Thankyou, your comments are always valuable. ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦       "Talk"? 10:57, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of List of locations in the Star Fox series
I have nominated List of locations in the Star Fox series, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/List of locations in the Star Fox series. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. TTN (talk) 16:53, 10 December 2007 (UTC)