User:K1arraSFSU/Evaluate an Article

Lead Section:
=== The lead section is done very well, all links work and are appropriate to the topic though one of them was linked twice. It summarizes what is studied in zoology and the general history and important figures. ===

Organization and Writing Quality:
Article is well-written and easy to understand with all relevant information organized well.

Images and Media:
All images have captions that accurately describe them and are appropriate.

Talk Page Discussion:
The article is rated as a B-class article, the talk page consists off people talking about vandalism, copy-right, and some stuff to add.

Overall Impressions:
I think this is a good average article. It was very detailed in the information but based on the talk page seemed to have had a few problems like vandalism. I don't see any vandalism on it right now which is good. Some sections are shorter than others but are equally as important.

Which article are you evaluating?
(Provide a link to the article here.)

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)