User:KClaudio/Prenatal testing/Samarthsbhatt Peer Review

Peer review_2

This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info


 * Whose work are you reviewing? (KClaudio)
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:KClaudio/Prenatal_testing

Lead

Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content    added by your peer? No Lead on the sandbox.
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that    concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? N/A
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the    article's major sections? N/A
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present    in the article? N/A
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? N/A

Lead evaluation

Content

Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? N/A
 * Is the content added up-to-date? N/A
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does    not belong? N/A

Content evaluation

Tone and Balance

Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral? Yes.
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward    a particular position? No.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or    underrepresented? No.
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader    in favor of one position or away from another? No.

Tone and balance evaluation

Sources and References

Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary    source of information? Yes.
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the    available literature on the topic? Yes.
 * Are the sources current? Yes.
 * Check a few links. Do they work? Yes.

Sources and references evaluation

Organization

Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise,    clear, and easy to read? Yes.
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling    errors? N/A
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down    into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Yes.

Organization evaluation

Images and Media

Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance    understanding of the topic?
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright    regulations?
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

Images and media evaluation

For New Articles Only

If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability    requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary     sources independent of the subject?
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it    accurately represent all available literature on the subject?
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar    articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any     other features contained within similar articles?
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more    discoverable?

New Article Evaluation

Overall impressions

Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of    the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? The content has not yet     been added so, the article still is incomplete.
 * What are the strengths of the content added?
 * How can the content added be improved?

Overall evaluation

The work still is in progress as only one section has been added.