User:KCterm/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Gender inequality in China

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article because I have heard about gender inequality in China before, and I was interested to learn more in-depth details. Bringing more educational awareness to gender inequality is important. My preliminary impression was that it will be an interesting topic to contribute to and learn more about.

Evaluate the article
The article's introductory sentence does have a strong relation to the topic, but the rest of the lead section lists a bunch of random statistics that could be put elsewhere in the article. The lead does not include an overview of the major sections of the article. The lead includes some statistics that have ties to other material in the article, but are not necessarily needed in the actual lead. The lead is is unorganized.

The article's content is relative to the topic, but there are flags all throughout that say the content needs to be added to or updated. There is a lot of content that is missing and can be expanded on. The article mentions that it is part of a series on women in society.

The article's tone is overall neutral. I don't see anything that pops out right away to be biased information. There are some parts of the article that seemed to have more information than other sections, therefore the article is a bit unbalanced.

From what I can see, the facts in the article mostly come from reliable sources. Many of the citations are made from academic book and journals. Some of the sources are not current and need some updating. There seems to be a need for more current sources of information on the topic. The links to the sources work when I click on them. The sources seem to come from a diverse spectrum of authors.

Some of the article is well-written, but certain sections seem to need more work. I don't see any grammatical errors in the article so far. I think the organization of the article could use some updating. Some of the main topics seem disorganized in comparison to each other.

There are images included that go along and enhance the topics of the article. The images are well captioned and seem to follow Wikipedia's citation guidelines. However, there are only three images for the entire article. More images could be added to enhance the material.

On the talk page, there is a lot of conversation happening. The conversations revolve around fixing citations, how to correctly use sources, getting facts correct, and rewriting sentences and topics. It seems like some of the last updates happened in 2016. In 2016, the responses and conversations stopped. The WikiProjects of the article include: economics, feminism, gender studies, China, and Women's History. It's rate as a start-class and mid-importance.

I think the overall status of the article is that it is incomplete. The article is mostly unorganized and does not have a strong lead. There are main topics that need to be expanded on greatly. Citations need to be checked, as well as some grammar. There needs to be more images added, and the sources and information in the article needs to be updated to present information and statistics. The article does, however, included a good basis to start on. There are many topics and information that work great for the article. It will be good to expand on.