User:KD455/Plautilla Bricci/BellaRoseMo Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

KD455


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Plautilla Bricci - Wikipedia
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Plautilla Bricci - Wikipedia

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead:

The lead covers the main aspects of Plautilla Bricci's importance while staying concise. The information in the lead can also be found throughout the rest of the article.

Content:

The content added to the article is all neutrally written as well as balanced throughout.

Sources and References:

The references/sources all seem reliable and relevant to the topic. One of the references is in Italian, but there is enough of a balance between primary and secondary sources that the article seems credible. All of the links work.

Organization:

There are some sentences that were difficult to understand when I first read them, but I was unable to find any obvious grammatical or spelling errors. The structure of the article overall focuses mainly on her work, but I believe that this makes sense and works for this article.

Images and Media:

The images within the article do assist in enhancing the understanding of the impact Ms. Bricci had on the projects she compiled over her career. They are also laid out simplistically with captions explaining their purpose. I would like to have seen more images of her work, however the way the article is now works as well. The images are cited correctly.

Overall Impressions:

This is a brief but in-depth look at Plautilla Bricci's work, life, and legacy. As I said before, there are some sentence structuring/flow things I noticed that could enhance the article, however, I think that this article was edited very well.