User:KGu81/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.


 * Name of article: (link)20 July plot
 * Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate. I choose this article because it's interesting and I wanted to learn what was the July plot.

Lead

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes it does.
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?It does really state what are the main sections.
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?no it does.
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?it is concise

Content

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic? The articles sticks with the topic
 * Is the content up-to-date?Yes it is last update was on the 9th of September.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? Everything is fine and the topics supports the topic very well.

Tone and Balance

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article neutral? The article is neutral, it states facts.
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No there aren't.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? No there aren't any viewpoints.
 * Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? The article doesn't attempt to persuade.

Sources and References

 * Guiding questions


 * Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Yes the are.
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Are the sources current? Some are but some are dated back.
 * Check a few links. Do they work? Yes they do work.

Organization

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Yes it is but there were times when it wasn't clear that I had to read it two times.
 * Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors?No it doesn't
 * Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?Yes all the sections reflect the major points of the topic.

Images and Media

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?Yes it does.
 * Are images well-captioned? Yes
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? Some photos have caption but do not mention by who took it.
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? Yes they are.

Checking the talk page

 * Guiding questions


 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic? Basically behind it there have been previous chats of how to improve the article.
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects? It is part of the WikiProjects.
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class? It's different because it gives help to evaluate the articles and how to edit it.

Overall impressions

 * Guiding questions


 * What is the article's overall status?It's good
 * What are the article's strengths? The article strength is that it's well organized.
 * How can the article be improved?Maybe add a little bit more details on certain topics.
 * How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed? It is well-developed.

Optional activity

 * Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~


 * Link to feedback: