User:KMayberry/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Clinical physiology

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

I chose this article because I hadn't heard of Clinical Physiology before. Simply put, it is a medical practice that analyses the functions of the body through the use of equipment measures.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

The lead section had a good brief overview of what the topic was, followed by further descriptive details. Regarding content quality, the article was mainly only made up of two parts, history and role, making it rather short, however, both had a similar amount of information provided. Tone and balance are appropriate. Within the references section, it looks like they may have quoted the same work twice. Images are not used in this article, which was discussed among the group under the talk feature. The article is not a current Wikiproject, however it was a school based assignment between August 28,2019-December 15,2019. My overall impression of this article is that it is too short, I'm not sure I quite understand how it is different from other medical professionals.