User:KOSMiKiNG/Brissus latecarinatus/Piilaniii Peer Review

General info
KOSMiKiNG
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:KOSMiKiNG/Brissus latecarinatus
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Brissus latecarinatus

Evaluate the drafted changes
Please answer the following questions in detail addressed to the classmate whose article you are reviewing. Remember this is constructive feedback, so be polite and clear in your suggestions for improving their article. We are all working together to improve the Wikipedia pages for species native to Hawaii and for the World to meet.

Use a different font style (bold or italic) for your answers so it is easy for the author to see your comments!

RESPONSE TO PEER REVIEW
 * 1) First, what does the article do well? (Think about content, structure, complementing the existing article, writing, etc.) I like that it is really organized and is very easy to comprehend.
 * 2) * Is there anything from your review that impressed you?
 * 3) * I was impressed that the Keeled heart urchin is found hroughout the indo-pacific in tropical waters of the Indian Ocean, Western Pacific, and all oceans connecting the two bodies of water.
 * 4) Check the main points of the article:
 * 5) * Does the article only discuss the species the article is about? (and not the genus or family) Yes
 * 6) * Are the subtitles for the different sections appropriate? Yes
 * 7) * Is the information under each section appropriate or should anything be moved? Everything looks good.
 * 8) * Is the writing style and language of the article appropriate? (concise and objective information for a worldwide audience) Yes
 * 9) Check the sources:
 * 10) * Is each statement or sentence in the text linked to at least one source in the reference list with a little number? Yes
 * 11) * Is there a reference list at the bottom? Yes
 * 12) * Is each of those sources linked with a little number? Yes
 * 13) * What is the quality of the sources? Both websites
 * 14) Give some suggestions on how to improve the article (think of anything that could be explained in more details or with more clarity or any issues addressed in the questions above):
 * 15) * What changes do you suggest and how would they improve the article?
 * 16) * Maybe more information about anatomy and culture.
 * 17) * Is the article ready for prime-time and the world to see on Wikipedia? If not, how could the author improve the article to be ready? More information and maybe a book resource.
 * 18) What's the most important thing the author could do to improve the article? Just adding more information to the article itself, especially the culture point of view.
 * 19) Did you notice anything about the article you reviewed that could be applicable to your own article? I like how each section isnʻt overly excessive or too long.

''I appreciate the review. To add as much information as possible to the article, I want to do more research and learn more about their eating patterns and activities. In order to avoid needing a complete section for the taxonomy box, I also want to find out how to include it. In order to complete the post, I would also want to locate some images. Finding additional reliable sources to base my research on would also be beneficial.''