User:KPP2020UPRC/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.


 * Name of article: Talk:Aladdin (2019 film)
 * Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate. - I chose this article because Aladdin is one of my favorite Disney movies, and I loved the live action.

Lead

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?

Lead evaluation
Yes, the lead does include an introductory sentence that describes the article very well.

Yes, the lead includes a brief description of the article's major sections.

no, the information that is presented on the lead i also in the rest of the article.

The lead is concise. Very easy to read and understand.

Content

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
 * Is the content up-to-date?
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics?

Content evaluation
Yes, the content is relevant to the topic. It is very specific and detailed.

The content is up to date.

All the content in this article belongs, I think there should be content on where we could watch deleted scenes.

Tone and Balance

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article neutral?
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?

Tone and balance evaluation
I do not think this article is neutral, just because this article does not talk about anything negative.

This film was criticized, and accused of colorism and whitewashing.

i don't think this article was overrepresented nor underrepresented.

No, I do not think the article is attempting to persuade in favor or against anything.

Sources and References

 * Guiding questions


 * Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Are the sources current?
 * Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible?
 * Check a few links. Do they work?

Sources and references evaluation
Yes they are.

Yes, most of them do.

Yes.

The links work.

Organization

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?

Organization evaluation
Yes, the article is well-written, concise, clear and very easy to read.

As far as i noticed, the article is well written.

Yes, the article is divided by sections and they are specific

Images and Media

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

Images and media evaluation
The article only include one image. On the top right of the article.

Yes.

Yes it does

Yes.

Checking the talk page

 * Guiding questions


 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?

Talk page evaluation
The conversations on the talk page are about the whitewashing situations and improving the information.

This article is rated as C-class, and is within the scope of WikiProjects Film.

We have not talked about this article in class.

Overall impressions

 * Guiding questions


 * What is the article's overall status?
 * What are the article's strengths?
 * How can the article be improved?
 * How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed?

Overall evaluation
The articles strengths is how is well organized.

The article can be improved by better use of words, the article is very well describe but i think that it can be even better.

I understand why it is a C-Class. The article is well developed, but like I said before, it can be improved by a better use of words.

Optional activity

 * Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~


 * Link to feedback: