User:K Wilson12/Long jump/Jweat24 Peer Review

General info
(K.Wilson12)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:K Wilson12/Long jump
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Long jump

Evaluate the drafted changes
There is no lead in the beginning, but the Article body looks well formed out. The tone and the content are well put together because he stays on topic about his content on long jumpers. The tone also sounds neutral and have no biased opinion in it. The references come from valid sources and he does not copy right when using the article as a reference. Wilson has the perfect amount of links and citations. Overall this seems like a very good article with a solid source and all It is missing for real is a lead to the article.