User:KaKaZhang668/History of Breton nationalism

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:KaKaZhang668/History_of_Breton_nationalism

thumb

Proposal And Source Justification Of The History Of Breton Nationalis

Proposal And Source Justification Of The History Of Breton Nationalism. History of Breton History https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Breton_nationalism

The Brittany history challenges us to explore a historical explanation, to identify a guiding thread, and, more crucially, to comprehend the roots of its seemingly chaotic development. Because the patterns were complex, conflicting, and obfuscated, the demand for an explanation—a cohesive simplification—was even higher. (Brett, 2014). To comprehend the transitions that all societies underwent during that time period, their conflicts, and internal economic, political, and social reform, it is appropriate to look at the big picture, to consider all of the accomplishments of the various social sciences, due to these transformations influenced both the economic and political conditions of individual lives, as well as their temporal course, or history.

Motivation Inasmuch as the nationalist movement tries to construct a hegemonic representation of Breton society as a nation in reaction to French nation building,Guy (2019) Brittany looks to be an "invisible nation." This brief examination of Breton historiography aims to demonstrate that two historical cycles (1830-1964 and 1964 and onwards) provide a contradictory narrative of Breton society's historicity. Following a static and 'ontological' stage, a more contemporary idea of historical development focuses on a dynamic vision of the nation, emphasizing the confluence of social and political issues throughout history. (Brett, 2014). This' refoundation' led to a genuine integration of nationalism in contemporary Breton society, but it also fed serious media polemics about the nationalist movement's history and historiography. (Oslon, 2017). The Breton movement's history is divided into three phases: the First Emsav, which covers the years before 1914, the Second Emsav, which covers the years 1914–1945, and the Third Emsav, which covers the postwar movements. The collaboration of several major Breton nationalism during the German rule of France has damaged the historical record of the Second Emsav in the minds of many.The movement was highly discredited politically after the war, and numerous of these members were incarcerated as collaborators. The second Emsav vanished completely. Breton nationalism was almost silent for two decades just after Second Emsav collapsed into indecision.

Importance The study of the history of the Breton movement allows one to compare the origins and evolution of various educational conceptions, practices, and theories in different parts of France. Cole (2013) As a result, it can help formulate fresh insights, patterns, and concepts while also providing a larger viewpoint. Brittany struggled hard to gain and keep its independence. Brittany is indeed an important agricultural region in France, despite decades of development and industrialization. Brittany stands out of the crowd in France as it has although being industrialized, the people still hold on to some of their cultural practices notably even in the 20th century.It combines enterprise and traditionalism.

Coherence that is profound Observing the common factors of the political and economic organization of societies in the twentieth century, we see deep cohesiveness in the century's developments if we set aside the view of the Brittany nationals that immediately reflects conflicts between superpowers and ideological opposition between their respective ideological propaganda France.（Cole，2013). It is derived from the good plan, which begins with a wave of centralization and ends with a wave of decentralization. It implies, if these advances are rational, the dominance of a particular organizational mode at a given point in technological history, which further loses its advantages to the benefit of a various social organization at a later time and in a different environment. And, in that light, the century proves to be astonishingly consistent at the end of it.Whatever the Britanny nationalists (firms, states, the economic system, politics, social and cultural relations), whatever the existing government (liberal capitalism or socialism) we regard, both the Brittany and France nationalists saw the the same changes and developments, the same anti-market, self-centered, anti-individualist, collectivist, and authoritarian ideologies, and the second century saw the polar opposite.

Closing Even if more effort is needed to fully comprehend the looming Breton paradox: a powerful and recognized identity that has yet to find a political translation. This paradox can be explained in part by the (historical) fate of the Breton movement and its history. The Breton movement, which has conservative roots and a fascination with the past, has never been able to become a central actor in Breton society and, as a result, has always struggled to be considered a legitimate player in the political definition of Brittany as a distinct society. Mendle (2004) In the twentieth century, its historiography has hampered the Emsav more than helped it, and its historical vision has remained peripheral for the most of its existence. Even until the 1960s, the historiography and analysis of the Breton movement were kept secret. The Emsav, on the other hand, has become a valid object for historians and social scientists since the 1970s, spawning a new scientific historiography.

References; Brett, C. (2013). Brittany and the Carolingian Empire: A Historical Review. History Compass, 11(4), 268-279. Cole, A. (2013). Beyond devolution and decentralisation: Building regional capacity in Wales and Brittany. Manchester University Press. Guy, B. (2019). St Samson of Dol and the Earliest History of Brittany, Cornwall and Wales, ed. Lynette Olson. Mendel, K. (2004). Regional languages in France: The case of Breton. LSO Working Papers in Linguistics, 4, 65-75. Olson, L. (Ed.). (2017). St Samson of Dol and the earliest history of Brittany, Cornwall and Wales (Vol. 37). Boydell & Brewer.

Annotated bibliography Brett, C. (2013). Brittany and the Carolingian Empire: A Historical Review. History Compass, 11(4), 268-279. It implies This'refondation' led to a genuine integration of nationalism in contemporary Breton society.

Cole, A. (2013). Beyond devolution and decentralisation: Building regional capacity in Wales and Brittany. Manchester University Press. Decentralization is depicted in this book in the French area of Brittany. It draws empirical findings from in-depth fieldwork in both locations and offers the results of a comparable public-opinion survey.

Guy, B. (2019). St Samson of Dol and the Earliest History of Brittany, Cornwall and Wales, ed. Lynette Olson. Brittany looks to be an "invisible nation."

Mendel, K. (2004). Regional languages in France: The case of Breton. LSO Working Papers in Linguistics, 4, 65-75. This article illustrates how,the Emsav, on the other hand, has become a valid object for historians and social scientists, spawning a new scientific historiography.

Olson, L. (Ed.). (2017). St Samson of Dol and the earliest history of Brittany, Cornwall and Wales (Vol. 37). Boydell & Brewer. Olson edited the history of Brittanny in a summary of its three phases of Emsav century.