User:Kac1418/9to5/Sillygoose128 Peer Review

General info
Kac1418
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Lead
Is the lead concise or is it overly detailed?

- I found the lead to be pretty good, I think the basically thesis statement for the article could be brought up a little sooner but otherwise I think it is very good.

Content
Is the content added relevant to the topic?

- I felt that the added info was very relevant with what had been said and was only expanded upon in this article

Tone and Balance
Is the content added neutral?

- It is very neutral and there is no bias within in it, when reading.

Sources and References
Are the sources current?

Do the sources links work?

- The sources were found to be up to date and current within the article.

- Clicked through through and they do work

Organization
Is the content added well written? Grammatical errors?

- I found there to be no grammatical errors and I thought the content was well written and diverse. I found it very intriguing when reading it, and had very good sentence flow.

Overall Impressions
Has the content added improve the overall quality of the article?

- I thought the added information was very beneficial to the article. Due to the article having a lack of these topics prior to them being added. I found it to be a very good add. I thought I learned a lot about the movement in general when reading this and found everything to be linked back to the bibliography which was good. I think it overall has been written well and made a great addition to what had previously been there.