User:Kacart98/Evaluate an Article

User:Kacart98/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Postpartum psychosis

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
The reason I chose this article is to further dive into a topic that I feel like hasnt been broughtt enough light and attention. Although postpartum depression is starting to finally get more light, I don't think the severity of it is talked about enough if we don't recognize the warning signs and get help as early as possible. My preliminary impression was similar to any other type of psychosis such as confusion, incoherent speech, delusions, trouble sleeping, and possible underlying pyschological disorders.

Evaluate the article
The lead section is concise and straight to the point. It starts with describing the article's topic. I do think it is lacking in briefly describing the upcoming sections of the article. The article's content is very thorough and completely aligns with the topic. It discusses many concerns with the topic such as risk factors, background information, treatment, prognosis, etc. It also appears to show a neutral, unbiased tone. It flows with more of an informational tone to give an understanding without trying to persuade. There are a plethora of references relevant to the article and from reliable sources such as peer reviewed journals with relevant information within the past 5 years. There are also multiple article contributors. The article is well-organized and written. It divides sections appropriately with no grammatical errors, making it easy to read. The article has a few images mostly related to diagnosing and treatment options to help with understanding and well-captioned, but I wouldn't say that they're necessarily laid out in a visually-appealing manner. They simply give the relevant information. The article is rated C-class so there's definitely room for improvement. Overall, I think this article has a good start, but I do think it can be improved by removing some irrelevant info that is not directly related to the topic at the end of the article. It starts going a bit off-topic the more you read it. But, it definitely starts out strong and I think it has potential to becoming well-developed.