User:Kaceygreen20/Chris Bumstead/MatthieuFoucu Peer Review

General info
Kaceygreen20
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Kaceygreen20/Chris_Bumstead/MatthieuFoucu_Peer_Review?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_peer_review
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Chris Bumstead

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Yes the lead has been updated correctly, it looks like everything is purely informational and no bias. It is concise and not overly detailed. All the sources are reliable and cited and it seems like the content has improved the article. Overall this is a short peer review but everything seems good and matches all the modules we learned.