User:Kackem/Kariba Dam/Giacorbett Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info
User: Kackem

Article: Kariba Dam

Lead evaluation
The lead gives a basic description of the topic of the article and all information in the lead is mentioned later in the article.

Content evaluation
The content added is relevant to the article's subject and to the section of the article it is in. The content is up-to-date and deals with a historically underrepresented population.

Tone and balance evaluation
The content is neutral and does not show bias to a side or viewpoint. The tone of the added section is informative and not persuasive.

Sources and references evaluation
The sources are current and all links work. The sources are written by different authors and seem to be reliable sources.

Organization evaluation
The content is easy to read and makes sense. There are no spelling errors and only one or two grammar errors.

Images and media evaluation
There are no images or media added to the article.

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.

New Article Evaluation
The article is a pre-existing article.

Overall evaluation
The content added is important and makes the overall article more complete. It expands on topics briefly mentioned in the article and adds relevant and current information. The content is written and organized well and it is easy to understand. The article could be improved by adding media or expanding further on the Basilwizi Trust.