User:Kadenk13/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Talk:Altered state of consciousness

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
It's an interesting topic and we know so little about what consciousness actually is.

Evaluate the article
This article is poorly written and vastly incomplete. The lead section doesn't provide anything of value or mention anything about the other sections of the article. The article has almost no content and what it does have isn't relevant because there's no citation or it takes on a first person point of view. A large part of the article was removed by the editor because it wasn't well researched or relevant to the topic at hand. There is no historical information in this article, just vague descriptions on what an altered state of consciousness is. There are no sources for the information presented by the author. The article is poorly written with grammatical errors and a failure of organization. It has different categories, but those categories offer nothing of substance. The article provides no images. The talk page is empty and the user is currently blocked. The article is very poor in quality. It only strength is the interesting topic it attempts to address otherwise it provides nothing that can be used as valuable information. It is very poorly developed and needs a lot of work. Its biggest issue is not having strong sources to back the information being talked about. A few solid peer reviewed sources are greatly needed for a well-written article.