User:Kadyb9/sandbox

Article with Partner
User:Mnwfk2/sandbox <-- Mikaela's sandbox. We will be working there!

This is my sandbox. I learned how to use bold text and create links.

Article Evaluation
Metallurgy
 * Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
 * Yes, it's relevant. I'm a little distracted by how some areas are really specific and some are very broad.
 * Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * I feel this article is neutral. The history section represents growth all over the world.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * I can see a couple concepts (i.e. steelmaking) that are not really talked about despite their importance to the industry
 * Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?
 * The first linked citation is in Russian so I don't feel it's very helpful. One of the links cites a whole book and doesn't give a specific page range for the topic so I feel like that could be improved.
 * Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?
 * There are some places that could use more sources but other need improvement (see above notes). Two sources link to businesses talking about their process and products so I feel like that could be biased, even if it's written in a neutral tone. It doesn't note this in the article.
 * Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?
 * Mentions a percentage of production and the link is not recent. Could be broken out into a graph or just more info
 * Check out the Talk page of the article. What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
 * Not a lot of recent discussion. I thought the "Merger proposal" was interesting
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
 * C-class, top-importance in engineering, high-importance in archaeology, also technology
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?
 * We have discussed some basic metals, like iron and copper, but we will talk about it later when we get to "Technology: Medieval China" because of early metal working