User:Kagnwiki/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Janet Abbate

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article because I chose to start a new article about Carolyn Marvin but this article seemed similar in content as it was about a female scholar and author. However, it also a good example to show me what would be good information to include and where I can improve my article. The Janet Abbate article seems to include a lot of basic, important information, but could maybe include some more about her with some more research.

Evaluate the article
The lead of the Janet Abbate article includes some good, baseline information that is important to know. It is very concise but definitely a little short. There could be more information both about her life and accomplishments and a little more about what other information is in the article. The content in the article is clear and informative and includes no bias and a good amount of sources. It also includes up to date information and some reference as to why both Janet Abbate and her work are relevant. However, there is not a lot of information there. It feels as though it is missing some more information like possibly a deeper look into her different books and work rather than just covering them in a short paragraph. The tone is very neutral and seems well researched but not biased. There are quite a few sources for such a short article and they all seem like good sources, both more primary and secondary, that provide just information about Abbate. While they are not the most up to date, I think that is more due to the nature of when Abbate published her work more than relevance or missing information. The article is well written and does not have any errors I can see. The article does not include any images. The article does not really have any discussions in the talk page besides one question about a citation that was left unanswered. It is of interest to a few WikiProjects and is ranked 'start class' for all of them. My overall impression of the article is that while it is a good start, including some important baseline information, there is much more that could be added. There are a good amount of sources but could use some more information about Abbate's work and could use some images to enhance the article. While it is well written, it seems incomplete.