User:Kai423/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Academic English

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
It pertains some connection with my class and taking cursory glance it seems under developed. It seemed easier to critic.

Evaluate the article
The lead is awfully short with only 3 sentences introducing the subject. The beginning does not mention the other sections scores and disputation.The content for every section is short and could use more information/examples. Though the content for each section is roughly equal. The sources are extremely out of date, all at least over 9 years old.

The tone of the article maintains a neutral tone. The three points of views under disputation seem adequately represented.

The sources need to be updated. The fourth one does not work and needs to be removed. Otherwise the information is academically sourced.

The section units should be after program and section scores should be after units. The article otherwise has proper grammar and concise writing.

There needs to be some images of the universities who use the programs.

There are no discussions happening in the talk page just a student posting about their project about working on the EAP article. The article is under WikiProjects, related to education, languages, linguistics, and writing.

Overall the article looks barebones and is out of date. It needs to be updated with more information and recent sources.