User:Kaia UW/Columbia Center/Khascall Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

User:Kaia UW


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Kaia UW/Columbia Center


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Columbia Center

Evaluate the drafted changes
Hi Kaia,

I did a peer review for you; this is just preliminary because I want everyone to have reviews, we'll do another review before the article goes live.

Overall, what I am seeing here is that a lot of information that is in the current article is missing from the draft you have so far. Extending the current article by a full quality class might be hard because the current article is fairly detailed already. Let's meet to discuss.

What I see in your text right now is a history of the naming and height, which is in the current article under the design section. If you decide to keep this topic for the assignment, you'll want to think about how you might improve or extend what's already in the article, adding new references and content.

The second paragraph has some scope and tone challenges. Terms like "fantastic" or saying something is "for all age groups" makes sense in an advertisement but Wikipedia articles need to be neutral. The reference to the movie scene might belong in an article about the building, but probably would live in a separate section. I see that the article on the Willis Tower has a 'Cultural depictions' section. In general the Willis Tower article might be good inspiration for what you could add to the Columbia Center article if you decide to keep working on it.