User:Kainoasa/articleeval

Environmental studies

-  Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?

Yes everything in the article is relevant to the topic. The article is pretty straight forward and shows ideas clearly. Nothing distracting in the article.

-  Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?

There seems to be no information out of date on this page. I think some things that could be added that would elevate the article a lot would be to cover whats going on in the present day with environmental studies. It could also include famous environmentalists that were pioneers in the past and more present.

-   What else could be improved?

I think another thing that can be improved is the amount written in the article. I think that there could be more sections covering environmental studies in more depth.

-   Is the article neutral? Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?

The article is pretty neutral and presents facts only.

-   Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?

No viewpoints.

- Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?

All links work and support the article fully. I think that maybe a flaw in the citations is that the sources are only from Canada.

- Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?

Each fact is referenced and from a reliable reference. No bias statements in article.

-  What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?

Alot of conversations going on in the talk page are about what could be added into the article to go more in depth. The conversations actually present good ideas with valid sources as well.