User:Kaitcrain/Strong female character

Article Draft
The strong female character is a stock character, the opposite of the damsel in distress. In the first half of the 20th century, the rise of mainstream feminism and the increased use of the concept in the later 20th century have reduced the concept to a standard item of pop culture fiction.

Whether female characters are strong enough is often used as a gauge of story quality by critics, in a similar manner to whether the story passes the Bechdel test. However, some have criticized this metric for causing authors to avoid creating female characters with realistic weaknesses. The female characters that fall into this trope are often reduced to having one dimension with little development throughout their arc.

Traits
According to Carina Chocano, the strong female character has become a "cinematic cliché", resulting in character archetypes like the "alpha professional" whose laser-like focus on career advancement has caused her to become a "grim, celibate automaton", and the "gloomy ninja with commitment issues". By this metric, the strong female character is a woman with the gendered behavior taken out. This is a contrast to the traditional way women are displayed in media, Brooke Shapiro suggests in her research that the scarce times women are the forefront of the story, they are generally portrayed with the patriarchal ideologies of being emotional and codependent. There is no clear consensus on the definition of "strong female character". Alexandria Gonzales notes that the characters that fall under this category often described with traditionally masculine characteristics.

Another way this is shown is that the strong female character is sometimes distanced from femininity is by subverting the physical characteristics audiences have come to expect from female characters. For example, the titular character in Mulan rejects her feminine appearance to become a warrior by famously cutting her long hair with a sword. Some believe it describes characters with powerful physical abilities, such as those of Buffy Summers or Katniss Everdeen. Others believe it to represent the quality of a character's "inner life" and their relative importance in the story.

Criticism
Despite the fact that the archetype arose largely through feminism, it has not been universally well received by those supportive of women's rights. Sophia McDougall of the New Statesman has criticized the high prevalence of strong female characters for creating a cliché that represents women as unrealistically strong; she argues that the simplicity of this archetype does little to present women in media in a realistic, complex way. She points out that "Sherlock Holmes gets to be brilliant, solitary, abrasive, Bohemian, whimsical, brave, sad, manipulative, neurotic, vain, untidy, fastidious, artistic, courteous, rude, a polymath genius. Female characters get to be Strong". In analyzing characters that fall under this archetype, it was shown that they are often created with a narrow, male-influenced features that stereotype what it means to be strong. When these roles are displayed with a small scope of characteristics, it becomes the default expectation for what a woman should be while leaving so many other types of women underrepresented.

Over time, these valid criticisms and a new wave of feminism that has grown tired of "strong" being a female protagonists' only dimension has lead to huge production studios like The Walt Disney Company to usher in a new wave of female characters that have more to them than being princesses that can hold their own. For example, 2021's Raya and the Last Dragon features a story surrounding the relationships and growth of a dynamic group of female leads.