User:Kaitlyn Wendling/Nonstandard dialect/Sksc238 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Kaitlyn Wendling


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead:

Content:
 * There is a strong introductory statement that draws in the reader
 * There is a definition that is easy to understand and well written
 * There is good history behind the idea of the page that gives background
 * The lead is concise and has enough information to understand the page but does not hold too much information that is hard to read.

Tone and Balance:
 * All of the content is related to the topic and is consistent
 * The dates of the citations are alarming to know if the information is up to date or not
 * The content does all seem to be in place and nothing stand out as out of place
 * The topic of the article is relevant to equity gaps and linguistic history like the assignment was instructed.

Sources and References:
 * The content all related back to the topic and is relevant
 * The facts are all neutral and not bias to any particular stance
 * No information is overwritten about and it all evenly distributed

Organization:
 * The references are from early 2009s and 1990s
 * Newer references could carry more relevant and up to date information
 * Citations look consistent and line up with the in text citations
 * The citations are relevant to the topic of the page
 * The sources are NOT up to date- could be more current
 * The authors of the citations have different points of view and beliefs giving the article  unbiased information.
 * My only note would be to find more recent articles that may be more relevant to the current stance of nonstandard dialect
 * The links do work

Images and Media:
 * Content is clear and concise
 * There are no grammatical or spelling errors that i noticed
 * It is a well organized introduction with relevant information

Overall Impressions:
 * There are  no photos yet uploaded to the wiki page


 * Overall, i think that the article is so far well written and relevant to the topic chosen
 * I think this is a good draft so far and is definitely on the right track
 * Only notes
 * Add relevant pictures
 * Add more up to date citations that are more current and more relevant information form more current authors.