User:Kaitlynne.Chaffin/Dorothy Reed Mendenhall/Herk0000 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Kaitlynne.Chaffin


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Kaitlynne.Chaffin/Dorothy Reed Mendenhall
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Dorothy Reed Mendenhall

Evaluate the drafted changes
After reading your draft, I feel like you are in a good position to continue adding more to the article. You did a good job adding sentences that were unbiased and neutral. I saw that you added a few citations to the existing article. I clicked on the link attached to source #1 and it successfully navigated me to a new page and the information supported the article claims. I like how you added how she learned to read, write, draw, and paint before ever receiving a formal education at the age of 13, that is interesting information. I suggest you to add more information from this link as well. I know you haven't gotten past the education section, but this source seems to have good information you could add to the work section as well. When I looked at the original article, I did not see any huge content gaps or missing sections. In addition, it did not seem like the information was over/underrepresented. With that being said, I think you should focus your efforts on expanding what is already there. Everything in your sandbox is properly cited except for the last paragraph in the education section. I saw that you have noted that a citation is needed at the very end but you might want to consider adding another one in that paragraph as well.

I think you mainly need to focus on adding more the article, because although you added some citations, a lot of the sentences in your sandbox already existed in the article. You have good sources and I think a lot of information can still be used from them. Keep up the good work and I am excited to see how your article progresses!