User:Kaitlynnehafer/Evaluate an Article

Everything in the Article is relevant and stems from how AIDS was discovered and to what it is today. The information is in date but has not been updated in over ten years so we will have to update that. I believe there are a number of parts that could be elaborate on and we should discuss new medications that have been created. I do not see and equity gaps given it covers multiple people and regions. I also believe that it is currently lacking in relevant details. The content yet again is present but it does not stay up to date given that it was last updated in 2008. The article is very neutral and fact driven giving different kinds of diseases that are associated as well as how it will affect the human body. Overall I believe that it is a well written article it just needs to be updated and elaborated on in some areas as well as polished when mentioning certain details.

Which article are you evaluating?
(Provide a link to the article here.)

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)