User:Kaitlynwu18/Termination signal/Jneyyan Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Kaitlynwu18


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 *  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Kaitlynwu18/Termination_signal?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template 
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Termination_signal

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead
The lead doesn't really give a summary/brief description of the sections of the article, just the introduction to the topic.

Content
Confused on the reason why the first section is titled "Polymerase read through"? Maybe mention in those paragraphs that it has to do with the ability of the polymerase to read the termination sequences.

Is the content added relevant to the topic? - for the most part, but the use of polymerases in recombinant proteins does not seem to be the most relevant thing to talk about for Termination signals, especially if there are only two sections for it right now. maybe rename the section to "Applications" and include other examples of its use as well.

Is the content added up-to-date? - most of the references are kind of recent, most recently from 2015

Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? - what about termination signals in eukaryotes? What about the termination efficiency of polymerases other than T7? How downstream of genes are they located? is there only one per gene? how many on average per chromosome? The info at the very bottom about the 3 nucleotide termination signal should be at the top. Also what is the difference between a stop codon and termination signal?

Sources and References
Reference 2 and 5 are the same.

The content is all back up by sources, but each paragraph clearly stems from different sources. I think it would be stronger if you found multiple sources on the same topic and interspersed your references for each paragraph.

Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? - there can be more sources to strengthen the article.

There can be more recent sources as well.

Organization
The text is hard to read and does not flow from one topic to the other at all, even within the same paragraph. There are a couple of grammatical errors.

Images chosen are clear and well captioned!

Overall impressions
The article is more complete, it's just that the information that was added was not the kind of information I expected as the most relevant to the topic. However, I haven't done a literature search on it, so perhaps there is not much else about this topic. I would say that it can therefore be improved by adding more basic information before going into translation efficiencies and recombinant tech. The strengths of the article are the images - where they are placed, their captions, and the images themselves. Also, the content of the article goes into detail.